Taiwan’s Corporate Governance: Explorations from the Ethical Corporate Governance Model

Taiwan’s Corporate Governance: Explorations from the Ethical Corporate Governance Model

Hsiang-Yi Lin (Ching Yun University, Taiwan) and Li Lin (Tamkang University, Taiwan)
Copyright: © 2011 |Pages: 22
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-129-4.ch006
OnDemand PDF Download:
Available
$37.50
Current Special Offers
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter discusses the meaning and internal and external mechanisms of Taiwan’s corporate governance, explains why this kind of mechanism cannot prevent the agency problem, and demonstrates the importance of business ethics by looking at the flaws in Taiwan’s corporate governance. Other questions addressed in this study include what limitations are in the internal and external mechanisms of Taiwan’s corporate governance, what makes the agency problem seem inevitable, and whether business ethics may compensate for the shortcomings in Taiwan’s corporate governance. In this chapter, the correlation between business ethics and corporate governance is reviewed and organized in order to demonstrate how this topic was viewed by previous scholars along with a proposal of how these two topics can be joined together. The question of how the agency problem in corporate governance emerges is then examined, followed by a literature review of past studies on the influences of introducing business ethics on the agency problem as well as their relationship. The findings of the new business model are discussed in the section V.
Chapter Preview
Top

Literature Review

C. Stone (1993) pointed out why law cannot replace ethics through three aspects. The first aspect is that the legislation of a new law often only takes place after a certain issue has emerged quite a while ago and thus lags behind. The second aspect is with the legislative process, in which legislatures may have different or insufficient legislative knowledge, and passed bills are often compromised. Lastly, the procedures of reaching a verdict and enforcing the law are all expensive expenditures, and even law enforcers themselves may get slothful on their job (Stone, 1993, 162-166). J. Bentham (1987) conducted an in-depth discussion on what kinds of behavior should be intervened by the law and which behaviors should stay in the domain of morality and ethics. Bentham believes when the cost of law enforcement outweighs the benefits to the society, intervention should be done through the domain of morality and ethics instead of the law; the same goes for offenses that cannot be clearly defined (Bentham, 1987, 62-63).

Hsu (2004) further pointed out that though the law upholds the bottom-line of morality, it is also based on the moral foundation; therefore, he defines the relationship between the law and morality as “interdependence” and “pushing and pulling (Hsu, 2004).” From the above discussions we can see that the law and the domain of morality and ethics are complementary and interdependent. Therefore, a topic that interest many scholars is to contemplate on the issue of corporate governance from the perspective of business ethics that is not a part of the corporate governance law (please see Table 1 for details).

Table 1.
Relationships between law and ethics and morality
ScholarProposal
Bentham (1987) 1. When the cost of law enforcement outweighs the benefits to the society, intervention should be done through the domain of morality and ethics instead of the law;
2. Offenses that cannot be clearly defined should also be handled by the domain of morality and ethics.
Stone (1993) 1. Legislation often lags behind.
2. In the legislative process, legislatures may have the legislative knowledge gap, and passed bills are often compromised.
3. Reaching a verdict and enforcing the law are all expensive expenditures, and even law enforcers themselves may get slothful on their job.
Hsu (2004) 1. The law upholds the bottom-line of morality and is also based on the moral foundation
2. Defines the relationship between the law and morality as “interdependence” and “pushing and pulling.”

Source: Compiled by the Researcher of this Study

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset