Technology's Enabling Role to Improve Care Coordination

Technology's Enabling Role to Improve Care Coordination

Rima Gibbings, Nilmini Wickramasinghe
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1371-2.ch027
(Individual Chapters)
No Current Special Offers


The U.S. healthcare system has been often characterized as fragmented and disconnected. Lack of effective and concurrent adoption of information technology has been known to be a factor that contributes to the decentralization of healthcare systems. Fragmented systems are also responsible for creating silos that operate with minimal coordination. Clinicians in such systems are providing duplicate services because they are not aware of patient care plans set by other practitioners. These duplications could lead to prescription drug errors due to inconsistencies and lack of coordination in the treatment services and in some cases drug-drug interactions. The following suggests a role for technology to facilitate better care coordination.
Chapter Preview


Improving coordination between clinical settings will minimize fragmentation. With Medicare patients visiting on average close to seven providers in four settings annually, a large number of clinicians are linked to each other within patient-care networks (Kern, et al., 2019). Primary care providers positioned in these care networks are required to communicate with more than two hundred physicians and coordinate their Medicare patients care plans (Kern, et al., 2019). This amount of communication and care coordination requires accuracy and robust information systems that will optimize the data integration process. The process of care coordination will ideally include all patient needs, preferences, and capabilities (Pham, O'Malley, Bach, Saiontz-Martinez, & Schrag, 2009) which are gathered from different care settings to assist clinicians with the decision making process . The coordination of care also relies on active and accurate interaction between providers and patients. Patients with multiple chronic conditions and complex needs require a higher level of coordination to improve the quality of care services provided and control the cost of these services (Berenson & Horvath, 2003).

Enabling Role for Technology

The implementation of health information systems (HIS) can have vast and diverse indications on care measures. Different clinical settings could impose a wide range of requirements on health information systems. In complex clinical encounters with high-risk patients, clinical settings are required to assess a large volume of health information in a short period of time and carefully manage the appropriate health data to deliver to applicable clinicians. While health information management is highly relevant for providers, patients with multiple chronic illnesses require care services from different practitioners in a coordinated environment with an effective integration of care information (McCullough, Parente, & Town, 2016). In addition to these distinctions in processing health data (that are associated with different care settings), there also remains a high demand on health data reporting associated with regulations and value-based reimbursement models (McCullough, Parente, & Town, 2016). Several important factors influence the success of HIS implementations. One of these components is the degree of integration between implemented health information technology and clinical workflow which in turn relies on the complexity of the care facility and the level of investment and commitment displayed by the organizational leadership. Health information technology improves the communication and coordination of clinical care in addition to supporting information management.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: