The Development of Technology Integration in a Graduate Course for Practicing Teachers

The Development of Technology Integration in a Graduate Course for Practicing Teachers

Anneke Smits, Joke Voogt, Lieke van Velze
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 21
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7001-1.ch005
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter describes the design and outcomes of a graduate course for practicing teachers that aims to develop the quality of technology integration in their educational contexts. The course is rooted in a set of concepts and theories and in three pedagogical principles for enhancing teachers' technology integration. The outcomes of the course were measured by using a mixed methods design. After the course, all students showed satisfactory TPACK scores and most students (83%) produced lessons that showed a good quality of technology integration, and 75% of the lessons showed a rich array of technological affordances. Neither the quality of the technology integration as shown in their lesson design and enactment nor the number of different technological affordances students showed in their (enacted) lesson design were related to students' TPACK scores after the course. This unexpected finding is discussed. Students reported a development from unconscious technology integration to conscious technology integration.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

The ubiquitous presence of technology in society and in schools, as well as the affordances of technology for education warrant careful attention for the topic of technology integration in teacher education. As straightforward as this may seem, the actual practice of teaching pre-service teachers to integrate technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK, Koehler &Mishra, 2008) in their lessons is complex and not without problems. Teacher educators are faced with an array of prior experiences, attitudes, skill levels and fears in their students regarding the use of technology (e.g. in pre-service education: Sadaf, Newby, & Ertmer, 2012; So, Choi, Lim, & Xiong, 2012).

In graduate education, the differences between students may even be exacerbated by the different circumstances and school cultures in which students teach (Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010). The case study in this chapter concerns a graduate course on technology integration for in-service teachers. The central problem in this course is teaching technology integration to groups of practicing teachers from different content areas and different levels of education, with different prior experiences, attitudes, skills and fears regarding technology.

The graduate course Learning with Technology is taught at the teacher education department of a Dutch university of applied sciences. The course targets the development of TPACK in practicing teachers with a set of related concepts and the expression thereof in pedagogical reasoning and educational design. It is part of a two-year master’s program for practicing teachers who work in different educational settings (primary, secondary, special education, vocational education and higher education). The course has a duration of 10 weeks, and the study load amounts to 168 study hours. At the start of the graduate course Learning with Technology, students often fear that the focus is solely on technology and some students quickly state that they “are not a technology person.” In an early version of the course the authors had observed that too much focus on technology in the course tended to lead to resistance in a substantial percentage of students. This situation led to a redesign that begins with a focus on theoretical concepts that support the design of high quality learning situations with technology, rather than a focus on modelling the use of technology tools and applications. It was anticipated that teaching a set of concepts related to the TPACK framework, could shift the focus from technology to the core business of education: how to teach content in such a way that students learn and how to use technology to improve this process.

The problem central to this research is teaching technology integration to groups of practicing teachers teaching different content areas in different levels of education, with different prior experiences, attitudes, skills and fears regarding technology. The main research question guiding this study concerns the outcomes of the course Learning with Technology in terms of TPACK development and the quality of the ensuing technology-rich educational lesson design of the students participating in the course. This chapter provides the theoretical background of the course, the design and the outcomes.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Fit: The technology enhances content and/or pedagogy.

Pedagogical Synergy: The teachers’ pedagogy enhances the students’ learning process with technology.

Effectiveness: The effectiveness for learning of a specific technology in a specific content domain based on research evidence.

Learning: A cognitively active process that involves change in long-term memory as learners’ schemata are expanded during the process.

Technology Integration: The teachers’ conscious alignment between specific learning goals, (content specific) learning theory, affordances, and limitations of technology and active teachers’ and pupils’ roles.

Affordances of Specific Technology: The strengths/added value of specific technology in a specific educational context.

Essential Use: Technology use is essential when it leads to more effective learning, or when learning goals could not be met without the technology.

Conscious Technology Use: Technology integration that targets effective learning, takes place within the TPACK framework and pays attention to technological affordances (TK) and teaching roles (CK, PK, and PCK).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset