The Employee as a Human Resource: Advice for Business Faculty From CST and Management Theory

The Employee as a Human Resource: Advice for Business Faculty From CST and Management Theory

Stephen J. Porth (Saint Joseph's University, USA) and John J. McCall (Saint Joseph's University, USA)
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 13
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-4972-7.ch011

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors offer advice to business faculty at Catholic colleges and universities about how a robust and realistic conception of the human person can inform their teaching. This research can support faculty of mission-driven schools of business as they seek to operationalize the implications of the religious affiliation of their institutions. The authors begin by sketching the evolution of management theory over the last century and how theory has changed to represent a fuller and more accurate account of the nature of persons in organizations. They show how the consistent prescriptions of more than a century of Catholic social thought (CST) parallel those now offered by management scholarship. The authors note, however, that though the content of the advice coming from these respective traditions of thought has converged, the grounds of that advice continue to differ in important ways. They conclude by recommending that business faculty embrace and adopt the conception of the person now largely shared between CST and contemporary management theory.
Chapter Preview
Top

The Evolution Of Management Thought

The Great Wall of China and the castles of Ireland are a just a few examples of the enduring evidence of the long-standing practice of management. After all, a castle cannot be built without planning, procuring materials, organizing workers and coordinating their efforts. So the practice of management is ancient but the theory of management is novel. Historians claim that it wasn’t until the early 1900s that the theories and principles of management were first developed and codified:

Starting in the late 18th century (and the Industrial Revolution) when machine power was substituted for human power, it became more economical to manufacture goods in factories rather than homes. These large, efficient factories needed someone to forecast demand, ensure that enough material was on hand to make products, assign tasks to people, direct daily activities, and so forth. The “someone” was managers, and these managers would need formal theories to guide them in running these large organizations (Robbins and Coulter, 2009, p. 25).

Thus began our modern development and understanding of the theories of management. Since its inception the focus of management theories – on people, resources and achieving organizational goals – has not wavered. What has changed, however, are social and economic conditions in which management is practiced and the field’s understandings and assumptions about employees and organizations. As the field has evolved and matured, so too has its understanding of human nature and how to effectively manage people in organizations, as well as the nature of the firm and the keys to competitive advantage. These changes are summarized in Table 1 and discussed briefly below.

Table 1.
School of ThoughtFocusHuman NatureCompetitive Advantage
Classical-The Physical Task
-Industrial Engineering; Time and Motion Studies
-Worker as a physical asset; a factor of productionTangible Assets, Land, Capital and Efficiency of Workers
Behavioral-Social and Psychological Aspects of Work
-Hawthorne Studies
-Worker as a social, psychological beingOrganization design, Group dynamics, Leadership, Motivation
Contemporary-Innovation and Change
-Information Age
-Resource Based View of the Firm
-Knowledge WorkerKnowledge, Skills, Intellectual Capital, Value creation, Innovation

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset