The Impact of School Leadership and Professional Development on Professional Commitment: A Hierarchical Linear Modeling Approach

The Impact of School Leadership and Professional Development on Professional Commitment: A Hierarchical Linear Modeling Approach

John K. Rugutt (Illinois State University, USA), Caroline C. Chemosit (University of Kabianga, Kenya), Viviline Ngeno (University of Kabianga, Kenya) and Dorothy Soi (University of Kabianga, Kenya)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9948-9.ch015
OnDemand PDF Download:
$30.00
List Price: $37.50

Abstract

This study used hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) approach to investigate the impact of school leadership, professional development, gender and teaching experience on professional commitment with a sample of 396 elementary and secondary school teachers and administrators from Kenya. The HLM results indicate significant differences among schools (?2 (49) = 218.92, p<0.001), with an intra-class correlation of 0.3183 indicating that 31.83% of variance in professional commitment was among schools. When professional development and school leadership were used as level 2 predictor variables with no level 1 predictors, the school variability dropped from 4.73584 to 3.30865 indicating that 30.14% of variance in school professional commitment was due to school leadership and professional development (?2 (47) = 161.67, p<0.001). Further, the reliability of the sample means in any school for the true mean school professional commitment was 0.703.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

The face of education is always changing. Those who enter the field have many challenges that affect them daily. These challenges lead to educators feeling overwhelmed and frustrated, which in turn affects their personal and professional lives. Individuals who enter the educational arena do so because of their love for education. According to Darling-Hammond (2001), thirty percent of novice teachers exit the profession prior to their fifth year. Is this due in part to job stress or lack of professional commitment and or school leadership issues? With federal mandates, such as the No Child Left Behind Act (2002), requirements for recertification, class sizes, student behaviors, low salaries, outdated materials, and lack of administrative support, one may expect to find a correlation between job stress and burnout rates.

In the United States, school districts hire approximately 230,000 teachers each year (Darling-Hammond & Sykes, 2003). But, retaining teachers is a far larger problem than training new ones – and a key to solving teachers ‘shortages’ is dealing with the major problem of exodus of new teachers from the profession, with more than 30% leaving within five years (Darling-Hammond & Sykes, 2003). The National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (NCTAF) reports that as many as 46% of new teachers leave the education profession after five years (2003). This revolving door of new teacher attrition results in costs to teaching and learning that involves hiring and training new personnel; costs to school culture and climate as large numbers of faculty leave every year; and costs related to student learning as children, particularly those in high-needs schools, are constantly exposed to novice practitioners who do not remain long enough to develop teaching expertise. Ingersoll and Smith (2004), state High rates of teacher turnover can inhibit the development and maintenance of a stable and reliable learning community. Research also indicates that lack of community involvement in school activities may have a negative effect on teacher retention, thus creating a vicious cycle.

School improvement goes hand in hand with student achievement and that most of these improvements are in direct line with the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB, 2002) legislation, which requires schools to demonstrate Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) as well as utilize learning methods that are validated by scientific research. Regardless of school level, primary or secondary school, the canons espoused in NCLB (NCLB Mandates) cut across schools, school districts, states, and nation and even internationally for every learning institution strive to ensure that there is quality learning that follows clearly stipulated scientific research methods for assessing teaching, learning and learners’ outcomes. How each school level deals with the mandates of NCLB as well as the demands of public pressure to improve student performance goes hand in hand with school leadership and teacher professional commitment that this study seeks to explore.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Reliability Analysis: This is a measurement technique that allows researchers to assess the stability of measures. It measures remain stable or consistent over time, then they are said to be reliable.

Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM): A statistical technique that is used when data are nested within levels, a student is in a classroom, a classroom in a school, a school in a school district and school district in a regional office of education. HLM makes it possible to separate the variance into components explaining the effects of different levels of analysis.

Intra-class Correlation: This is a measure of homogeneity among the members of a group, class, or cluster. It measure is often used to assess interrater reliability ( Vogt, & Johnson, 2011 ).

Factor Analysis: This is a statistical technique that allows researchers to reduce a large number of variables to smaller number of variables. It is a data reduction technique that uses associations among variables to build cluster of items.

Cronbach’s alpha: A measure of internal reliability or consistency of the items in an instrument, index, or scale (attitude scale, questionnaire, tests).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset