The Innovation Potential of Communities of Practice in Higher Education

The Innovation Potential of Communities of Practice in Higher Education

Margot Bracewell, Isabel Cordua-von Specht, Rebecca Wilson-Mah
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2943-0.ch010
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter applies scholarly reflection to discuss the experiences of faculty and staff who convene, facilitate, and maintain two active but different communities of practice (CoP) in the same university. With a focus on innovation, the authors explore how practice-based, social learning in two different CoPs have supported local change in the organization and contributed to positive outcomes and improved processes. Taking a comparative approach, this chapter explores the practical process aspects associated with convening, facilitating, and maintaining two CoPs, including the varying influences of: scope, structure, leadership and convening, and engagement and participation. The authors discuss and compare how the innovation potential of a CoP is shaped by, and must adapt to, its specific context within the university.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

In this chapter, the authors share a scholarly reflection on their experiences convening, facilitating, and maintaining two active communities of practice (CoP) at Royal Roads University (RRU). The authors discuss and compare how the innovation potential of a CoP is shaped by, and must adapt to, its specific context within the university. Moreover, the chapter provides insight into how both tacit and explicit learning embedded within CoPs themselves have the potential to create a shift in an institution’s approach to organizational learning.

The two CoPs are: 1) a group of faculty members interested in advancing their interdisciplinary case research capabilities, and 2) a group of administrative staff looking to improve communications across work units and to learn from each other. Their respective purpose statements clearly identify the interest area and context of their function:

Community of Practice for Interdisciplinary Case Research (ICR CoP): This CoP supports one another to work together to develop capacity in case research, writing, teaching, and publication.

Community of Practice for Administrative Staff (Admin CoP): We, the community of administrators at Royal Roads University, share a common desire to co-create and co-facilitate a mutually supportive and open work environment that optimizes opportunities to share and benefit from each other’s ideas, skills, knowledge, and experience.

The concept of innovation considered in this chapter draws from employee-driven process innovation, with innovation understood as a means to positively affect work processes or methods (Ellström, 2010, p. 29). Applying Ellström’s discussion of practice-based innovation, the communities of practice examined in this chapter are contributing to innovation by creating the learning conditions for practice-based renewal of work processes and/or work responsibilities (2010). For example, the ICR CoP seeks to increase the productivity and quality of cases for teaching and publication, whereas the Admin CoP seeks a shared understanding of the university’s administrative processes and aims to improve and streamline these processes.

Brown and Duguid (1991) posited that CoPs, as emergent and evolving groups, presented particularly valuable sites for innovating in organizations and noted that “knowledge-practice separation is unsound, both in theory and in practice” (p. 41). This chapter approaches the enhancement of learning and innovation in higher education from the perspective of informal, situated organizational learning, and the grassroots creation of CoPs organized by faculty and staff.

Top

Background

The CoPs discussed in this chapter operate within the institutional context created by aspects such as the values, norms, and organizational structures formed at Royal Roads University (RRU) in Victoria, B.C., Canada. RRU was established in 1995 as a public university with interdisciplinary programs at the undergraduate and graduate levels solely in applied and professional fields. RRU is a relatively small university, with approximately 3,000 students and 475 employees, including 75 full-time faculty members. The university's size and origins have contributed to a culture that aspires to being nimble, flexible, innovative, and entrepreneurial, though increasing bureaucracy has hampered the institution from fully realizing these.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Community of Practice (CoP) Members: “ People who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly” (Wenger, 2015 p. 1).

Community of Practice for Administrative Staff (Admin CoP): A community of administrators at Royal Roads University, who share a common desire to co-create and co-facilitate a mutually supportive and open work environment that optimizes opportunities to share and benefit from each other’s ideas, skills, knowledge, and experience.

Community of Practice for Interdisciplinary Case Research (ICR CoP): This CoP at Royal Roads University supports one another to work together to develop capacity in case research, writing, teaching, and publication.

Innovation: A means to positively affect work processes or methods ( Ellström, 2010 , p. 29).

Community of Practice (CoP): Wenger (2010) further defined a CoP as a learning partnership with four characteristics: 1) domain of interest , 2) community , 3) practice , and 4) convening .

Organizational learning: Ellström (2010) defined organizational learning as changes in organizational practices, for example, routines and procedures, structures, systems and technologies that are mediated through individual learning or problem-solving processes.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset