The Institutional Imperatives of Local Economic Governance: Lessons from a Small Island Developing State

The Institutional Imperatives of Local Economic Governance: Lessons from a Small Island Developing State

Eris Dawn Schoburgh
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2448-0.ch038
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In Jamaica, a “new” local governance framework comprises a federated system of development committees (community development committees [CDCs], development area committees [DACs], and parish development committees [PDCs]) purportedly working in partnership with local authorities. Local governance is thus premised on the idea that utilization of local skills, knowledge, assets, and initiatives will lead to economic transformation. Focus has also shifted to micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), given their local embeddedness and potential to foster local economic growth. This chapter investigates the extent to which local economic development (LED) model implementation is supported by appropriate governance structures. It argues that implementation of an LED model represents a decisive shift from local governance to local economic governance, which currently lacks a cohesive policy framework. The consequent effect is nothing more than atomized organizational actions that engender competition among localities and communities rather than a clear growth strategy at the local level.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

From reading the leading regional newspapers, there can be little doubt that a major topic on the minds of Caribbean policy leaders is the state of Caribbean development. Indeed, the so-called “wicked problems”, combined with complexities of small size that further exacerbate the extent of integration into the global economy and levels of public debt, have challenged the economic growth agenda for most of the post-independence period for the majority of small island developing states (SIDs) in the region. An article in the Jamaica Observer of November 10, 2013 attributes the following view of the state of Caribbean economies to Dr. Kenneth Anthony, Prime Minister of St. Lucia:

(T)he Caribbean is experiencing ‘a tragedy of the times’, on account of governments being engaged in one form or another of self-denial while the Caribbean remains in the throes of a major crisis like it has never ever experienced before... the spectre of evolving into failed societies is no longer a subject of imagination…how our societies crawl out of this vicious vortex of persistent low growth, crippling debt, huge fiscal deficits and high unemployment is the single most important question facing us at this time…a grave economic crisis is gnawing away at Caribbean countries while governments are busy looking inward – each busy with their own agenda rather than pursuing a Caribbean solution to the economic crisis. (jamaicaobserver.com)

As leader of a political administration and past legal advisor to the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), the Prime Minister’s position makes him a legitimate bearer of the facts, however unsavoury. Furthermore, regional academic and policy discourses lend support to his views (Bernal, 2000; Briguglio, Persaud, & Stern, 2005; Hall & Benn, 2003; Payne & Sutton, 2001; UNECLAC, 2005; World Bank, 2005).

A 2012 ECLAC-AFD study on patterns of Caribbean development highlighted the region’s search for an appropriate development model, even after decades of experimenting with approaches that run the gamut from “industrialization by invitation”, transfer of technology, diversification of the economies, to promotion of regional integration. Increased incomes in some countries reflect significant socio-economic gains, but the ECLAC-AFD study found that these countries are threatened by low productivity, low levels of competiveness in certain productive sectors, fiscal and debt crises, natural disasters, and climate change. Further, up until the 1980s some economies relied on agriculture as the basis of their economic strategy, but following the loss of their preferential status as primary exporters to Europe, they have had to make the transition to tourism and offshore financial services as sources of income. The study concluded that “a lack of sustained growth in per capita incomes … makes it difficult to lift a large enough segment of the population out of poverty” (p. 8). The economic profile of Caribbean economies is shown in Table 1. Annual growth rates have fluctuated but have remained below world trends for the most part.

Table 1.
Economic profile of Caribbean
CountryPopulationTotal Area (km2)Type of Economy
Anguilla15,35891Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Antigua and Barbuda88,710443Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
The Bahamas342,87713,940Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Barbados273,331430Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Belize307,00022,966Goods Export (Agricultural products and oil)
Dominica67,757751Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Grenada104,487344Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Guyana754,493214,970Mixed – Goods Export/ Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Jamaica2,741,05210,991Mixed – Goods Export/ Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Montserrat5,93440Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Saint Kitts and Nevis52,402230Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Saint Lucia174,267617Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Saint Vincent / Grenadines109,333389Consumer Service Export (Tourism)
Suriname524,636163,270Mixed – Goods Export (Energy and bauxite/alumina)
Trinidad and Tobago1,341,4655,130Goods Export (Energy)

(ECLAC-AFD, 2012, p. 8)

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset