The study comes as a result and in response to the identified priorities of the social policy in Bulgaria and logically outlines the actions for an effective management of the social processes tailored to the dynamic social environment. The essential characteristics of the social policy, its relations with the social management, and the opportunities for it to become a way of realization of important public tasks gives the chance to fit in it more delicate and important problems and the associated solutions. For this reason, the achievement of an active labor market is perceived as an objective of the social management, reachable in the conduct of relevant social policies, reflecting the registered interests of interested parties and society's need for an appropriate and irreversible change. The actually active social programs, interpreted as a system of social projects with direct feedback of social interaction, define the possibilities for adaptation of their components to the coming changes.
Top1. Introduction
The challenges of seeking answers to questions in terms of their usefulness, efficiency and effectiveness are related to a definite and accurate knowledge of these processes and their impact on the entire social process in which they take place, or, to be more precise, are part of it. The impact of science on our development is a process that itself does not need to be proven, because its results are obvious to all. Perceiving science as something abstract and incomprehensible would rather harm the process of its understanding and evaluating.
Numerous state and public institutions, Ministry of education and science of Bulgaria being one of them, are devoted to this task as part of their obligations. By developing and implementing different models and techniques in this directions there always will be support and opposition. However, in no way should this frighten, offend or discourage any of the parties. Achieving maximum justice is already a strong motivation to keep on going in the direction of objectifying the essential processes related to the scientific and research activities. Moreover, over lifelong existence it has been proven that the progress is related to scientific breakthroughs that are part of human experience (Terziev, 2020; Terziev, 2020а).
Very often people perceive things quite pragmatically and are satisfied with the explanation that their present state is acceptable enough. The changes are rather unwanted or frightening because we associate them with ourselves. The academic community is quite conservative in its pointviews and is perceived as self-sufficient. This acceptable way may be relatively good for a certain period of time, but it is by no means acceptable and progressive for the development of these processes.
The term “process” is complicated enough in the sense we use it, because on the one hand, it is continuous and has a number of characteristic features, complexity and even contradictions. It should be considered, defined and analyzed by all its participants, but mostly by those who will benefit from it, i.e. the people. Other way it will be just a pseudoscience that will bring satisfaction to a man himself without being useful to others. You will agree that the main benefit in this direction is the applicability of everything that scientists and researchers do. Historically, this has been repeated many times over the years, and in many cases scientific discoveries have been accepted and valued much later. Accepting or denying a certain scientific activity demands its understanding and approval by the society, which is not always an easy and achievable task from any point of view and sometimes impossible for a scientist (Terziev, 2020; Terziev, 2020а).
Usually, scientific discoveries, researches or scientific projects are published in specialized publications that are available to a limited number of users who are engaged in this activity or these publications have limited access which in most cases is paid. This additionally complicates the process of their approval. Due to the need of scientific research to be published in databases with reviewed content, i.e. those that contain scientific information of high value and are peer-reviewed, they have become publications with closed or limited access to this information. This is understandable, considering the effort and hard work of respective teams or specific researchers to get feedback and be assessed in an appropriate and аcceptable manner (Terziev, 2020)