The University Instructors' Opinions About Emergency Remote Education in Turkey

The University Instructors' Opinions About Emergency Remote Education in Turkey

Halil Kayaduman, Ali Battal
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7275-7.ch004
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This study explores university instructors' opinions regarding emergency remote education practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. This research included 248 university instructors from 29 universities in Turkey. The findings revealed the instructors' positive and negative opinions, educational preferences, and support demands. While instructors found the process useful in terms of cost-effectiveness, providing individualized learning environments, and supporting ubiquitous learning, their negative opinions stemmed from course-, student-, technology-, and instructor-related factors. The instructors demanded support in technology and training aspects, and they preferred face-to-face education rather than blended and distance education. This study suggests considering the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework for professional development programs. As well, it emphasizes the importance of open educational resources and collaboration efforts at the institution level to share digital resources to eliminate the digital divide and digital literacy issues.
Chapter Preview
Top

Literature Review

Distance education has a critical role in education and provides many advantages. Due to technological advancements, distance education has transformed into an online format; subsequently, online campuses, courses, and programs have emerged and become widespread due to facilitating access to learning materials, promoting cost-effectiveness, and providing personalized learning environments (Moore & Kearsley, 2011). With the recent Covid-19 outbreak, educational institutions have moved their practices to an online format, taking into consideration the advantages of distance education. Although the practices during the Covid-19 pandemic seem to be distance education, the current literature distinguishes online or distance education from emergency remote education. While distance education is expressed as a more planned and guided practice that offers an alternative method to face-to-face education, emergency remote education is a sub-branch of distance education that emerged as an obligation to survive in the time of crisis (Bozkurt et al., 2020). Given the rapid and obligatory transition to online education due to the Covid-19 outbreak, the practices in the current situation could be considered emergency remote education.

The research studies in the literature explained that emergency remote education revealed some of the challenges regarding educational implementations. The digital divide is one of the problems and it is expressed as the division between those who are able and unable to access digital technologies (Selwyn, 2004). The practices in emergency remote education highly depend on technological devices and the internet; as a result, the digital divide became a more evident problem (Bozkurt & Sharma, 2020). A recent study, which spans the reflections from many countries around the world (Bozkurt et al., 2020), stated that the digital divide was prominent in both developed and developing countries; people accessing digital technologies managed the emergency remote education process better than those who do not have them. In another study, Fishbane and Tomer (2020) pointed out that students who are unable to afford digital technologies and high-bandwidth internet connections struggled with additional problems to catch up with their peers in the time of the Covid-19 pandemic. Similarly, Bozkurt (2020a) noted that emergency remote education practices during the Covid-19 pandemic increased social injustice and widened the gap among students depending on the facilities they have. Hence, the digital divide could be said as one of the challenges that emerged as a result of emergency remote education.

Key Terms in this Chapter

COVID-19: It stands for corona virus disease and highly infectious (WHO, 2020).

Case Study: In-depth description and investigation of a context (Merriam, 1998).

Digital Literacy: The attitude, ability, and awareness of people to access, manage, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information through digital tools (Martin & Grudziecki, 2006).

Emergency Remote Education: A sub-branch of distance education and it was stated as an obligation to survive in the time of crisis (Bozkurt et al., 2020).

Digital Divide: The division between those who can access digital technologies and those who are unable to access them (Selwyn, 2004).

University Instructors: Academic staff working at tertiary institutions to teach associate, undergraduate, and graduate courses.

Distance Education: A planned and guided practice that offers an alternative method to face-to-face education (Bozkurt et al., 2020).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset