Universities in Developmental Transition: From Ivory Tower to Engaged and People-Centered Institutions

Universities in Developmental Transition: From Ivory Tower to Engaged and People-Centered Institutions

Kenneth Dipholo, Ndwakhulu Stephen Tshishonga
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8213-8.ch014
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter interrogates the benefits that would accrue to and challenges faced by universities in their developmental transition from being an ivory tower to engaged and people-centered institutions. The chapter argues that universities should consider themselves as vehicles of socio-economic change by participating in the process of forming values and setting reachable goals for the benefit of larger society. University of Botswana (UB) adopted ‘Strategy for Excellence: University of Botswana Strategic Plan to 2016 and Beyond' while the University of KwaZulu-Natal has adopted Strategic Plan 2017-2021 with eight goals. Through these plans, the universities seek to have a more direct impact within communities and society. Community engagement or service learning is adopted as one of the vehicles to fast-track the transition process in this chapter. This chapter is qualitative and has made use of UB and UKZN as the case studies to deliberate the university transition from ivory towers into engaged, responsible, and people-centered institutions.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Universities across the globe play a pivotal role not only in developing human capital, but also in undertaking ground-breaking research with solutions to socio-economic and political challenges (Tshishonga, 2020). The authors argue that communities could attain substantial value from universities and colleges if society and the university are linked together and tackle realities of today and developmental needs of the country. Thus, the current complex challenges should help transform universities from their narrowly conceived traditional roles as hallowed walls for intellectual cultivation, usually for a handful of very privileged elements in the society (Ramphele, 2008). In line with this traditional view, universities are located in cities but a majority of them are actually not part of these cities (Dipholo, 2014). They are literally detached and perhaps unfamiliar with the immediate needs of the surrounding communities. Their detachment from their surroundings renders them elite institutions accessible to a few (Troy, 2007). In differentiating the different universities, Soudien (2016) argues that access in elite systems is often based on privilege, access is based on obligation for the privileged, a narrow pursuit of intellectual excellence to enhance their academic prestige, render universities almost imaginary, elitist and disconnected from social reality of the ordinary people (Makgoba and Mubangizi, 2010). However, universities within their capacity can contribute effectively to the community to which they belong and a broader society (Kupe, 2019). Such a role could be executed among others by training people and studying what has to be done to assist the community in the same way as communities can contribute to the growth of universities and the attainment of their strategic plans.

However, universities whilst rightfully engaged in intellectual pursuit should not do so for their own sake. They should consider themselves as vehicles of socio-economic change by participating in the process of forming values and setting reachable goals for the larger society (Preece, 2013). Thus, universities should consolidate their traditional roles of teaching and research by assuming an active role in the process of bringing positive change in the economy and society (Maurrasse, 2001). Within higher education, teaching and learning as well as research are considered core business and can be instrumental in addressing the inequalities of society (McKenna, 2016). McKenna (2016)) went on to highlight that in order to address the national skills deficit, higher educations could be essential for economic growth, individual social mobility, and financial security. In a bid to respond to current challenges facing higher learning institutions and the unfolding national, regional, and global framework, the University of Botswana (UB) adopted a guiding document called ‘Strategy for Excellence: University of Botswana Strategic Plan to 2016 and Beyond’. The Plan has six priority areas amongst them ‘Strengthening Engagement’, with which the university seeks to have a more direct impact within communities and society including a key role in developing Gaborone as a learning city. In this regard, the University of Botswana (UB) seeks to make community service an integral part of its overall mission. Community service is defined by Lulat (2005, p. 262) as:

Extension of university expertise to the world outside the university, the community, in the service of improving the quality of life of the community and which is affected through a university model in which community service is integral to all aspects of the university mission, structure and organization, hiring and promotion, curriculum and teaching, research and publications, etc.

Thus, community service or service learning or community engagement is a broad aspect that encompasses a variety of activities at different levels (Uys, De Kadt, Bawa & Mazibuko, 2010). While emphasis is on extending university expertise, community service may as well include more simple aspects such as opening up its facilities for use by the community (Tshishonga, 2020). University exercise of its social responsibility could enable communities to attain substantial value from universities if society and the university are linked together and tackle realities of today and development needs of the country (Dipholo, 2014).

Key Terms in this Chapter

University Social Responsibility: Is a social responsibility model where universities exercise their ability and commitment to encourage students, and the academic staff provide social services to their local communities.

Ivory Tower: Is a metaphor used to describe a university that is detached from its surrounding areas or communities in this chapter.

Community engagement: Is one of the core university businesses to teaching and research and it is through community engagement or service learning that students are placed within organizations, government departments or community-based structures with the primary purposes of affording them to integrate theory into practice.

People-Centred Institution or University: Is an institution or university dedicated to advance development that promote the needs, aspirations and expectations of people and stakeholders.

Community Service: Is service or services extended to the community by the university or any organisation in the form of community projects such as helping out in the local library, cleaning the environment or a park, assisting senior citizens, assisting children withier homework.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset