Using Action Research to Develop a Public Programming Strategy for Heritage Assets, With an Example From South Africa

Using Action Research to Develop a Public Programming Strategy for Heritage Assets, With an Example From South Africa

Patrick Ngulube (University of South Africa, South Africa)
Copyright: © 2018 |Pages: 27
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3137-1.ch004
OnDemand PDF Download:
No Current Special Offers


The literature on action research and how it should be applied is extensive. However, this chapter is not intended to be a substitute for or to provide a synopsis of the substantial body of literature on action research. Its aim is instead to show the potential benefits of this underutilised research approach in heritage management research. Although there are many varieties of action research, the major elements of action research processes are action, research, and participation. Action research has a collaborative social change agenda, with democratic transformation being achieved through the participation of professional researchers and practitioners. It bridges the divide between the outsiders (researchers) and insiders (stakeholders), and differs from many conventional research strategies in that it identifies a problem and attempts to provide a solution that leads to a change in the community or organisation. The case study on developing a public programming strategy for archival institutions in South Africa presented in this chapter illustrates this point.
Chapter Preview


Action research is a participatory, collaborative and democratic approach in the development and application of practical knowledge that encompasses all stakeholders in the context of a scientific inquiry. According to Cooke and Cox (2005) action research has been used to positively change behaviour, and transform and improve the social context in which it occurs, “for example in sustaining social movements, in international development, in education, in social work, and in (confronting) psychology” (p. xxxi). Compared with other research approaches, action research provides real “added value” (Eikeland, 2012, p. 9), and it bridges the gap between “outsiders” or “knower-researchers” and “insiders” or “known-researched” (Eikeland, 2012; Herr & Anderson, 2005; McNiff, 2014). The research results that are arrived at collaboratively by the researchers and participants are used to transform and guide a practical development intervention.

The literature on action research and how it should be applied is extensive, as evidenced by the numerous articles, books, handbooks and journals on the subject, some of which are included in the list of references at the end of this chapter. However, a search of the top ten journals indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases in each of the fields in heritage studies (i.e., archives, libraries and museums)1 revealed only limited use of participatory approaches in describing, explaining, exploring and understanding the dynamic research matters in the field. There may be a variety of reasons for this, the first being the emphasis on ‘publish or perish,’ causing researchers in heritage studies to choose an easier research approach, and thus to shy away from an approach such as action research, which is relatively complex and sometimes questionable. Second, a lack of understanding of this transformative and emancipatory research strategy owing to the existence of a variety of hybrids of action research may contribute to its low uptake. Third, the fact that until the 1990s action research struggled for legitimacy made it a late entrant into the arena of field methods (Noffke & Somekh, 2009). Fourth, emerging researchers struggle with the conflicting and contradictory messages in action research texts about conducting action research and its characteristics (McNiff, 2014). These four obstacles constitute real difficulties for heritage professionals even if they were to think about implementing action research to inform their practice.

Texts that aim to make the action research approach accessible, especially to those who are new to the field, are therefore extremely valuable. The application of action research may lead to the production of actionable and practical knowledge, proving the criticism that most of the knowledge that heritage management practitioners produce has little relevance to heritage management to be unfounded.

Action research offers heritage management professionals an excellent opportunity to improve their practice and open communicative spaces in which to explore pertinent issues on the main agenda of heritage institutions, such as the presences and absences in heritage collections, equity in the utilisation of heritage assets, the sustainability of heritage assets and appropriate funding models. Communicative spaces provide an opportunity to engage in a constructive dialogue among stakeholders, and facilitate the development of sustainable solutions for the betterment of society. In other words, communicative spaces open the dialogue of communicative action among stakeholders.

The objective of this chapter is to encourage heritage professionals to think systematically about how to conduct action research, including how to overcome the epistemological, ethical and quality assurance difficulties associated with it as a research approach. Having read this chapter, readers should therefore be able to:

Key Terms in this Chapter

Public Programming: A planned sequence of community outreach programmes and promotional activities, which include lectures, seminars, workshops, exhibits, displays, tours, newsletters, websites, and film shows, aimed at informing the wider community about heritage assets and the need to utilise them.

Participatory Approaches: A broad set of collaborative research approaches with outcomes promoting the technical, practical, and emancipatory interests of the community involved in the research.

Triangulation: A strategy that validates data through the use of multiple approaches, multiple theories, or multiple sources of evidence.

Action Research: An interactive and collaborative process of generating and applying relevant and valid knowledge by “insiders” (usually individuals, organisations, or communities) and “outsiders” (mostly researchers, educationalists, social workers, or consultants) in order to move closer to improving and transforming practice.

Marketing Strategy: Usually drawn from marketing research, the marketing strategy combines all the marketing goals of an organisation into one comprehensive plan focusing on increasing marketing opportunities using limited resources, with the ultimate goal of achieving a sustainable competitive advantage.

Heritage Assets: A generic term which is sometimes used by social and cultural organisations such as archives, libraries and museums to describe their collections and holdings with tangible and intangible value which have artistic, cultural, economic, historical, social, scientific, spiritual and technological significance for the public, and contribute to the development of a sustainable knowledge-based society.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book: