Validation of E-Learning Courses in Computer Science and Humanities: A Matter of Context

Validation of E-Learning Courses in Computer Science and Humanities: A Matter of Context

Robert S. Friedman, Fadi P. Deek, Norbert Elliot
Copyright: © 2009 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-410-1.ch009
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In order to offer a unified framework for the empirical assessment of e-learning (EL), this chapter presents findings from three studies conducted at a comprehensive technological university. The first, an archival study, centers on student performance in undergraduate computer science and humanities courses. The second study, a survey given three times within EL classes, investigates the variables of learning style, general expectation, and interaction in student performance. The third study investigates student performance on computer-mediated information literacy. Taken together, these three studies—focusing on archival, process, and performance-based techniques—suggest that a comprehensive assessment model has the potential to yield a depth of knowledge allowing shareholders to make informed decisions on the complexities of asynchronous learning in post-secondary education.
Chapter Preview
Top

Archival Study: Two Disciplines

Research on rates of student success in EL classes tends to be drawn from single samples. Yet comparison of two disciplines—one invested in responding to empirically-oriented tasks in a limited response format (responding to multiple-choice questions or creating computer code), the other invested in responding to verbally-oriented tasks in a open response format (participating in on-line discussions or submitting essays)—seemed ideal in allowing more to be known about the specifics of EL across disciplinary frameworks (Elliot, Friedman, & Briller, 2005).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset