What the Flip: Embracing Flipped Learning as a Mediated Approach in Teacher Education

What the Flip: Embracing Flipped Learning as a Mediated Approach in Teacher Education

Crystal Shelby-Caffey, Samaneh Jafari, Mildred Reyes Munguia
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 14
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-6944-3.ch014
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Given the abrupt shift to online learning when schools closed down due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this chapter provides insights gained during the transition. The purpose of this chapter is to explore the use of flipped learning in teacher education courses as the courses transitioned to a virtual model. The authors discuss their participation in virtual professional learning communities (VPLCs) as well as efforts to engage students in VPLCs. This chapter offers perspectives of both instructors and students as well as insights gained while teaching in a teacher education program and while teaching at a Nicaraguan university. A primary focus within the chapter is the use of various technologies and the collaboration among colleagues in and out of the United States to instruct teachers candidates and practicing teachers from primary level through higher education programs. Practical guidance is offered to those looking to begin or further the virtual teaching and learning.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

In 2013, Fullan described the state of education as one in which both teachers and students were being pushed out of schools. He noted the tension between students’ boredom with current teaching methods and the coinciding pull toward external uses of technology. Fullan further cautioned against the urge to admonish teachers’ lack of technology use or attempts to inhibit students’ use of technology. Instead, the author (Fullan, 2013b) advocated for a “new pedagogy” that would meet the following criteria: a) irresistibly engaging for both students and teachers, b) elegantly efficient and easy to access and use, c) technologically ubiquitous 24/7 and, d) steeped in real-life problem solving. Moreover, educators were encouraged to assume the role of mentors who recognize and encourage while facilitating and stretching (Robinson, 2015). The recommendation came as educators were being pressed to infuse daily lessons with interactive technologies.

Scholars make comparisons between how students have learned in the past and the more participatory nature of contemporary instruction using digital media, as well as discussing the need for training a “corps of tech-savvy teachers” (Crane, 2009; Gee & Levine, 2008, para. 13). Gee and Levine (2008) posit that “most practitioners are unskilled in embedding new media in powerful instructional practices… [and] teachers cannot teach what they do not know” (para. 13). Without a bridge between new digital literacy practices and those traditionally emphasized in schools, there is a great potential for the creation of a new class of illiteracy (Gee & Levine, 2008; Shelby-Caffey et al., 2014). Though these contentions were primarily directed toward K-12 students and teachers, the pandemic exposed their pertinence to higher education and the applicability to professionals in different sectors. Likewise, the need for institutions to exhibit agility and resilience became evident.

Fast forward to March 2020, when communities and P-20 educational systems worldwide were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aforementioned arguments reverberated more as foreshadowing than mere assertion. Life as we knew it changed. As in-person classes came to a screeching halt, educators across the globe were forced to reconcile the chasm between traditional methods of doing schooling and the new realities of virtual teaching and learning. The absence of both digital technology and/or the requisite knowledge to fully engage students in using them drew attention to the necessity for a pedagogical evolution. Educators labored to adjust their classroom practices to unchartered digital spaces, with increasing energies devoted to what Crane (2009) characterized as social learning and networking as well as the interplay between consumers’ production, contribution, consumption, and acquisition of knowledge. As such, the use of technological resources such as Zoom, Google Classroom, Kahoot, Pear Deck, Screencastify, and Flipgrid emerged in classrooms as educators at all levels scrambled to figure out the best ways to use them to engage learners. Educators who were able to quickly make the shift and use the available technology likely provided much richer experiences for their students and contributed to students’ developing knowledge and capabilities that make them more apt to use technology.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Virtual Professional Learning Community (VPLC): A group that exists online and whose members share a professional/career background. The groups are assembled for the specific purpose of members sharing specialized insights with one another.

Asynchronous Learning: Student access an instructional video or other medium at their convenience

Hybrid Instruction: Instruction that includes a combination of in-person meetings and online/virtual meetings.

Virtual: Any activities that occur online.

Flipped Classroom: In its simplest form, this approach to instruction allows educators to invert the class design such that what would typically be done as “homework” is completed during class time while students digest lectures and mini lessons outside of class meetings.

Synchronous Learning: Instruction that occurs in real time and is not pre-recorded.

Educational Technology/EdTech: The use of technologies including hardware, software, and digital tools used for teaching and learning.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset