Search the World's Largest Database of Information Science & Technology Terms & Definitions
InfInfoScipedia LogoScipedia
A Free Service of IGI Global Publishing House
Below please find a list of definitions for the term that
you selected from multiple scholarly research resources.

What is Organizational Knowledge

Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition
Organizational knowledge is equated with professional intellect (Quinn, Philip, & Sydney, 1996). Organizational knowledge is a metaphor, as it is not the organization but the people in the organization who create knowledge
Published in Chapter:
Explicit and Tacit Knowledge: To Share or Not to Share
Iris Reychav (Bar-Ilan University, Israel) and Jacob Weisberg (Bar-Ilan University, Israel)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-026-4.ch235
The question of whether or not it is “worthwhile” for employees to share their knowledge has received a great deal of attention in the literature, which focuses on the technological factors that motivate knowledge sharing (Duffy, 2000). However, the ethical aspect regarding the question of knowledge ownership is discussed in only a partial way in Wang’s (2004) model, where he examines employees’ desire to share (or not to share) the knowledge they possess. This internal conflict is based on employees’ having to choose between their own personal interests and their ethical understanding about organizational ownership of all employee-based knowledge. This article will elaborate on and examine the implications of knowledge sharing at the individual level. Employees, who manage to find the balance between their own personal interests and their ethical understanding about organizational ownership of employee-based knowledge, will engage in a high rate of knowledge sharing activities in the organization. Goals of Managing Organizational Knowledge Sharing. An organization’s desire to manage its knowledge sharing activities is based on the need to capture, catalog and store the organization’s knowledge and transform it into knowledge that is both easily and immediately accessible to the organization and its members (Gupta & Govindarajan, 2000). The goal of knowledge sharing is to support and encourage the creation, transference, application and use of knowledge within the organization (Reychav & Weisberg, 2005). Scholars, researchers and practitioners alike express an increasing interest in the subject of organizational knowledge sharing between the individual employee and the organization, and among employees themselves (Almashari, Zairi, & Alathari, 2002). Types of Knowledge. One of the classifications of organizational knowledge differentiates between two types of knowledge: explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge (Polanyi, 1958); explicit knowledge represents the knowledge that is accessible to all organization employees, while tacit knowledge represents the personal knowledge possessed by individual employees. Organizations seek to obtain employees’ tacit knowledge and convert it into explicit knowledge, which can then be easily transferred to the organization’s technological systems and networks. In this manner, the knowledge is distributed throughout the entire organization (Inkpen & Dinur, 1998; Ruppel & Harrington, 2001), thereby increasing the organization’s human capital (its employees). Conflicts of Interest. Organizations invest in developing their human capital (Nahpiet & Ghoshal, 1998). As a result, employees expand their knowledge and expertise in order to create a personal competitive advantage within the organization and the market (Carlile, 2002). Knowledge is a resource and individuals who possess knowledge use it to acquire positions of power and control both within the organization and outside of the organization. Therefore, organizations that attempt to gain their employees’ knowledge (mainly of the tacit type) and make it accessible may, in the process, create a conflict of interests between the individual who possesses the knowledge and the organization that is interested in acquiring this knowledge (Storey & Barnett, 2000). Hence, the main question is: Why would employees be motivated to share their personal knowledge with the organization at the risk of losing their relative power and advantage over the organization and the market? This question is even more complicated in light of the employee’s other conflicting considerations: the understanding that the organization has ownership rights over the personal knowledge the employee acquires while employed by the organization, conflicting with employees’ desire to realize their own personal interests by achieving a position of power/status.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
More Results
The Concept of Knowledge Management: Rational vs. Multifaceted Perspectives
A learned set of norms, shared understandings and practices that integrate actors and artefacts to produce valued outcomes within a specific social and organizational context.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
E-Learning Design for the Information Workplace
The body of knowledge contained, but not categorized, within the members of an organization.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
Critical Success Factors and Core Competencies
The organizational knowledge is created and transferred within the organizational context, is rooted in: (1) company and industrial atmosphere (King & Zeithaml, 2003), (2) tacit knowledge (Grant, 2002); and is fitted in firm culture (Saint-Onge, 1996). Has the following properties: (1) is shared between the members of the organization (2) is connected to organization history, and (3) allows a common language.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
Enriching Organisational Knowledge of Corporate Social Responsibility From the Traditional African-Nigerian and Islamic Religion Perspectives
This refers to specific knowledge emerging from the collective experience of organisation as an entity as well as from the individual experience of organisational members for the purpose of achieving set objectives.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
Organizational and Socio-Relational Factors Undermining Knowledge Sharing in Family SMEs: An Empirical Investigation in the Italian Context
Knowledge is defined as information processed by individuals including ideas, facts, expertise, and judgements relevant for individual, team, and organizational performance.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
The Role of Management Accounting and Control Systems as Information Networks and as Networks of Relationships on the Development of Organizational Knowledge
The process of generating, sharing and utilizing knowledge in organizations; organizational knowledge develops from the interaction mechanisms between members of the organization.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
The Quality Attribution in Data, Information and Knowledge
Organizational information socially believed as justified truth and stored in organizational memory through organizational learning and that can be recalled as needed by any agent (e.g. individuals, automatic processes) in the organization.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
Samson and Delilah as a Discourse of Communities of Practice
Transfer of knowledge (based on an individual’s learning and experiences, and their application to solving work-related problems) from an individual to the organization, so that the organization rather than the individual owns it, and it has value for an organization to repackage as a service or offering.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
Knowledge Management Challenges in the Non-Profit Sector
Tacit and explicit knowledge that is part of the organization’s culture and identity, routines, standard operating procedures, and is expressed in documents.
Full Text Chapter Download: US $37.50 Add to Cart
eContent Pro Discount Banner
InfoSci OnDemandECP Editorial ServicesAGOSR