Implementation planning procedure, which uses the networked bar chart to break down the project activity in individual, sequential phases (stages). After each phase, results are assessed in regard to performance, quality, cost, and time goals. These milestones (gates) are used to determine the project’s continuation (go/no go).
Published in Chapter:
Project Management in Innovation Networks
Adam Melski (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany), Jan Borchert (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany), and Svenja Hagenhoff (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany)
Copyright: © 2008
|Pages: 11
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-885-7.ch168
Abstract
In times of market globalization, aggravated competition and the shortening of product life cycles, many companies have turned to innovations as elixirs for their continued existence (Little, 1997). Companies cope with increased innovation requirements by increasing their specialization in a certain field. This makes new innovation ideas more probable; however, it also complicates the process from conception to realization. Traditional leadership systems with rigid hierarchical structures are increasingly replaced by more flexible, interdisciplinary work forms, with networks becoming the prevailing form of organization (Man, 2004). Innovation plans are usually carried out in projects, thus the management of innovation projects has become the center of attention. However, the failure of many innovation projects sheds doubt on the usefulness of project management (PM). Studies demand robust process controlling to replace the more delicate PM (Hauschildt 2003). This article examines to what extend PM may be used as a “universal management instrument” (Seibert, 1998, p. 25) in innovation networks. In addition, further concepts and instruments that should be added to PM in innovation networks will be introduced.