Digital Native Students: Gender Differences in Mathematics and Gaming

Digital Native Students: Gender Differences in Mathematics and Gaming

Su-Ting Yong (The University of Nottingham, Selangor, Malaysia)
Copyright: © 2017 |Volume: 7 |Issue: 2 |Article: 2 |Pages: 14
ISSN: 1947-8518|EISSN: 1947-8526|DOI: 10.4018/IJVPLE.2017070102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Yong, Su-Ting. "Digital Native Students: Gender Differences in Mathematics and Gaming." IJVPLE 7.2 (2017): 13-26. Web. 1 Jan. 2019. doi:10.4018/IJVPLE.2017070102

APA

Yong, S. (2017). Digital Native Students: Gender Differences in Mathematics and Gaming. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 7(2), 13-26. doi:10.4018/IJVPLE.2017070102

Chicago

Yong, Su-Ting. "Digital Native Students: Gender Differences in Mathematics and Gaming," International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE) 7 (2017): 2, accessed (January 01, 2019), doi:10.4018/IJVPLE.2017070102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore gender differences among digital native students in mathematics learning and gaming. A quantitative dominant mixed methods approach was employed in which quantitative surveys [174 students] and qualitative interviews [eight students, eight parents and six teachers] were administered concurrently. Data collected has revealed that students are characterized as digital natives and do not portray a significant gender gap in technology usage. Nevertheless, males and females tend to demonstrate their digital native characteristics differently. Males are more likely to play computer games and acknowledge the many benefits of gaming. Moreover, boys have better spatial skills and they are more confident in mathematics. While females still lag behind males in spatial abilities and mathematics confidence in the past, digital native females are not helping to close the gender gap. Essentially, girls could play more computer games to strengthen their spatial abilities.

References

Becker, K. (2005). How are games educational? Learning theories embodied in games. Paper presented at theDiGRA 2005 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
Bonanno P. Kommers P. A. M. (2005). Gender differences and styles in the use of digital games.Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25(1), 13–41. 10.1080/0144341042000294877
Corbeil P. (1999). Learning from the children: Practical and theoretical reflections on playing and learning.Simulation & Gaming, 30(2), 163–180. 10.1177/104687819903000206
De Lisi R. Wolford J. L. (2002). Improving children’s mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing.The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(3), 272–282. 10.1080/0022132020959868312230149
Fraenkel J. R. Wallen N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Grace L. (2001). Barriers to learners’ successful completion of VET flexible delivery programs. In Proceedings of the AVETRA Conference Research to Reality: Putting VET Research to Work. Adelaide, Australia: Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association.
Guay R. B. McDaniel E. D. (1977). The relationship between Mathematics achievement and spatial abilities among elementary school children.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 211–215. 10.2307/748522
Helsper E. J. Eynon R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence?British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. 10.1080/01411920902989227
Kennedy G. E. Judd T. S. Churchward A. Gray K. Krause K. L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives?Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122. 10.14742/ajet.1233
Latham A. J. Patston L. L. M. Tippett L. J. (2013). The virtual brain: 30 years of video-game play and cognitive abilities.Frontiers in Psychology, 4(629), 1–10.24062712
Lucas K. Sherry J. L. (2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication-based explanation.Communication Research, 31(5), 499–523. 10.1177/0093650204267930
Mäntylä T. (2013). Gender differences in multitasking reflect spatial ability.Psychological Science, 24(4), 514–520. 10.1177/095679761245966023462757
Martinovic D. Ezeife C. I. Whent R. Reed J. Burgess G. H. Pomerleau C. M. Chaturvedi R. (2014). Critic-proofing of the cognitive aspects of simple games.Computers & Education, 72(1), 132–144. 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.017
McLeod D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In GrouwsD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Mertens D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology. United States: Sage Publications, Inc.
Mitchell A. Savill-Smith C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning: A review of the literature. London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Paul, A. M. (2013, July 24). Can playing video games give girls an edge in math? Retrieved from http://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2013/07/24/can-playing-video-games-give-girls-an-edge-in-math/
Phan M. H. Jardina J. R. Hoyle S. Chaparro B. S. (2012). Examining the role of gender in video game usage, preference, and behavior.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 1496–1500. 10.1177/1071181312561297
Pierce R. Stacey K. Barkatsas A. (2007). A scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology.Computers & Education, 48(2), 285–300. 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.006
PISA. (2012). PISA 2012 results in focus - What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
Prensky M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants.On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Prensky M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II: Do they really think differently?On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–9.
Sangcap P. G. A. (2010). Mathematics-related beliefs of Filipino college students: Factors affecting mathematics and problem solving performance.Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 465–475. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.064
Teo T. (2013). An initial development and validation of a Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS).Computers & Education, 67, 51–57. 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.012
Wells D. (2012). Games and mathematics: Subtle connections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139175838
West G. L. Drisdelle B. L. Konishi K. Jackson J. Jolicoeur P. Bohbot V. D. (2015). Habitual action video game playing is associated with caudate nucleus-dependent navigational strategies.Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 282(1808), 1–9. 10.1098/rspb.2014.295225994669
Yaratan H. Kasapoğlu L. (2012). Eighth grade students’ attitude, anxiety, and achievement pertaining to mathematics lessons.Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 162–171. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.087
Yong S. T. Gates P. (2014). Born digital: Are they really digital natives? International Journal of E-Education, E-Business. E-Management and E-Learning, 4(2), 102–105.
Yong S. T. Harrison I. Gates P. (2016). Using digital games to learn mathematics – What students think?International Journal of Serious Games, 3(2). 10.17083/ijsg.v3i2.113
Zelinski E. M. Reyes R. (2009). Cognitive benefits of computer games for older adults.Gerontechnology: International Journal on the Fundamental Aspects of Technology to Serve the Ageing Society, 8(4), 220–235. 10.4017/gt.2009.08.04.004.0025126043

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.