Reference Hub5
Second Life as a Surrogate for Experiential Learning

Second Life as a Surrogate for Experiential Learning

Michael N. DeMers (New Mexico State University, USA)
Copyright: © 2010 |Volume: 1 |Issue: 2 |Article: 2 |Pages: 15
ISSN: 1947-8518|EISSN: 1947-8526|DOI: 10.4018/jvple.2010040102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

DeMers, Michael N. "Second Life as a Surrogate for Experiential Learning." IJVPLE 1.2 (2010): 16-30. Web. 1 Jan. 2019. doi:10.4018/jvple.2010040102

APA

DeMers, M. N. (2010). Second Life as a Surrogate for Experiential Learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 1(2), 16-30. doi:10.4018/jvple.2010040102

Chicago

DeMers, Michael N. "Second Life as a Surrogate for Experiential Learning," International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE) 1 (2010): 2, accessed (January 01, 2019), doi:10.4018/jvple.2010040102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue PDF

Abstract

Second Life is increasingly being used as a venue for education, especially for delivery of online instruction where social presence and community building are essential components. Despite its robust 3-D modeling tools and powerful scripting language, many educational uses of Second Life are limited to passive forms of content delivery that often mimic some variety of Victorian style lecture setting. This article demonstrates a series of exercises designed around a more active learning model for my geography courses based on Kolb’s (2005) theory of experiential learning. Active class exercises encourage hands-on interaction with components of the virtual world, but are linked explicitly to real subject matter content. By providing fun pre-exercise training and promoting learning by discovery, the exercises are designed to encourage the four fundamental components of the experiential learning environment: involvement, reflection, analysis, and problem solving. Beyond providing an excellent educational environment, such approaches can act as surrogates for real-world experiences that are either impossible or logistically problematic.

References

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: online education in the United States, 2008. Sloan-C. Retrieved June 22, 2009 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/staying_the_course.pdf
Barab, S., Scott, B., Ingram-Goble, A., Goldstone, R., Zuiker, S., & Warren, S. (2007). Situative embodiment as a curricular scaffold: using videogames to support science education. In Proceedings of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved June 22, 2009 from http://inkido.indiana.edu/research/onlinemanu/papers/emb_lab_study.pdf
Berg Z. (2008). Multi-user virtual environments for education and training? A critical review of Second Life.Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 48(3), 27–31.
Bourke, P. (2008). Evaluating Second Life as a tool for collaborative scientific visualization. In Proceedings of the Computer Games and Allied Technology, Singapore. Retrieved June 30, 2009 from http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbourke/papers/cgat08/index.html
DeMers, M. (2008). Inside the metaverse: A Second Life for GIS education. GIS Educator, Winter, 3. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Redlands: California. Retrieved September 6, 2009 from http://www.esri.com/library/newsletters/giseducator/gised-winter08.pdf
Fuller I. Gaskin S. Scott I. (2003). Student perceptions of geography and environmental science fieldwork in the light of restricted access to the field, caused by foot and mouth disease in the UK in 2001.Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(1), 79–102. 10.1080/0309826032000062487
Haigh M. Gold J. R. (1993). The problems with fieldwork: a group based approach towards integrating fieldwork into the undergraduate geography curriculum.Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 17(1), 21–32. 10.1080/03098269308709203
Hargis J. (2008). Second Life for distance learning.Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 57–63.
Healey M. Jenkins A. (2000). Learning cycles and learning styles: the application of Kolb’s experiential learning model in higher education.The Journal of Geography, 99, 185–195. 10.1080/00221340008978967
Healey M. Kneale P. Bradbeer J. (2005). Learning styles among geography undergraduates: an international comparison.Area, 37(1), 30–42. 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00600.x
Herwig A. Parr P. (2002). Game engines: tools for landscape visualization and planning. Trends in GIS and virtualization. In Environmental Planning and Design (pp. 161–172). Heidelberg, Germany: Wichmann Verlag.
Hogg R. V. (1991). Statistical education: improvements are badly needed.The American Statistician, 45, 342–343. 10.2307/2684473
Jarmon L. Traphagan T. Mayrath M. (2008). 2009). Understanding project-based learning in Second Life with a pedagogy, training, and assessment trio.Educational Media International, 45(3), 157–176. 10.1080/09523980802283889
Jarmon L. Traphagan T. Mayrath M. Trivedi A. (2008). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: an interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life.Computers & Education, 53(1), 169–182. 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.010
Johnson J. L. (2000). Learning communities and special efforts in the retention of university students: what works, what doesn’t, and is the return worth the investment? Journal of College Student Retention: Research. Theory into Practice, 2(3), 219–238.
Kolb A. Y. Kolb D. A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory—version 3.1: Technical Specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct.
Kolb D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lowe, C., & Clark, M. A. (2008). Student perceptions of learning in a virtual world. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Retrieved June 30, 2009 from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/08_13442.pdf
McLoughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2002, June 24-29). Experiential learning on-line: the role of asynchronous communication tools. In Proceedings of the 14th ED-MEDIA World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Denver, CO.
McVey M. (2008). Observations of expert communicators in immersive virtual worlds: implications for synchronous discussion.Research in Learning Technology, 16(3), 173–180.
Nulty D. D. Barrett M. A. (1996). Transitions in students' learning styles.Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 333–345. 10.1080/03075079612331381251
Schneiderman B. E. (2008). Creating a learning space that is virtual and experiential.Journal of Aesthetic Education, 42(2), 38–50. 10.1353/jae.0.0003
Taylor K. (2006). Social networks and presence in Second Life.Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 721–722.
Trotter A. (2006). Educators get a “Second Life.”. Education Week, 27(42), 1.
Ward A. (2008). The power of connections.The American School Board Journal, 195(9), 52–54.
Yellowlees P. M. Cook J. N. (2006). Education about hallucinations using an Internet virtual reality system: a qualitative survey.Academic Psychiatry, 30, 534–539. 10.1176/appi.ap.30.6.53417139026

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.