Reference Hub2
Building a Model for Online Distance Courses Through Social Media and Networks

Building a Model for Online Distance Courses Through Social Media and Networks

Ed Dixon (University of Pennsylvania, USA)
Copyright: © 2012 |Volume: 3 |Issue: 3 |Article: 5 |Pages: 14
ISSN: 1947-8518|EISSN: 1947-8526|DOI: 10.4018/jvple.2012070105
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Dixon, Ed. "Building a Model for Online Distance Courses Through Social Media and Networks." IJVPLE 3.3 (2012): 81-94. Web. 1 Jan. 2019. doi:10.4018/jvple.2012070105

APA

Dixon, E. (2012). Building a Model for Online Distance Courses Through Social Media and Networks. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 3(3), 81-94. doi:10.4018/jvple.2012070105

Chicago

Dixon, Ed. "Building a Model for Online Distance Courses Through Social Media and Networks," International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE) 3 (2012): 3, accessed (January 01, 2019), doi:10.4018/jvple.2012070105

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue PDF

Abstract

This article describes the affordances of social media and networks for online Elementary German courses that have been taught at the University of Pennsylvania since 2010. These online courses were created to provide students the opportunity to take Elementary German as part of the language requirement for Penn credit during the summer months when students are away from campus. Like their face-to-face counterparts, the online courses are grounded on the principles of communicative language teaching and learning but clearly reveal the potential of these principles to maximize participation, promote learner autonomy and influence student outcomes when applied to collaborative online learning spaces. This paper explains the pedagogy behind the online courses, outlines their relationship to the face-to-face language classroom, and describes how student interactions are key to the learning process. It considers the importance of electronic and digital literacy (Warschauer, 2006) to the growth of new methodologies, materials development, assessment, articulation, intercultural competence, and student progress. This paper also compares the instructor’s experiences of teaching in the online environment with those of the face-to-face classroom and discusses how these distinct and separate learning spaces are in many ways related and can inform each other. Finally, the author considers new possibilities for language learning through emerging technologies.

References

Berger T. Thomas M. (2011). Integrating digital technologies in education: A model for negotiating change and resistance. In ThomasM. (Ed.), Digital education: Opportunities for social collaboration (pp. 101–119). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blake R. (1999). The role of technology in second language learning. In ByrnesH. (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages (pp. 209–237). New York, NY: The Modern Language Association of America.
Blake R. (2009). From web pages to distance learning: Technology in the foreign language curriculum. In LancashireI. (Ed.), Teaching literature and language online (pp. 23–37). New York, NY: The Modern Language Association of America.
Cambridge D. Cambridge B. Yancey K. (2009). Electronic portfolios 2.0: Emergent research on implementation and impact. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Chaka C. (2011). Web 2.0 digital technologies in education. In ThomasM. (Ed.), Digital education: Opportunities for social collaboration (pp. 37–59). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Costa C. (2011). Educational networking in the digital age. In ThomasM. (Ed.), Digital education: Opportunities for social collaboration (pp. 81–99). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Coyle D. (2005). Exploring zones of interactivity in foreign languages and bilingual education. In HolmbergB.ShelleyM.WhiteC. (Eds.), Distance education and languages (pp. 309–326). Trowbridge, UK: Cromwell Press.
Garrido C. (2005). Course design for the distance learner of Spanish: More challenges than meet the eye. In HolmbergB.ShelleyM.WhiteC. (Eds.), Distance education and languages (pp. 178–194). Trowbridge, UK: Cromwell Press.
Guillerme M. (2000). Intercultural competence. In ByramM. (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 297–300). London, UK: Routledge.
Hampel R. (2010). Task design for a virtual learning environment in a distance language course. In ThomasM.ReindersH. (Eds.), Task-based learning and teaching with technology (pp. 131–153). London, UK: Continuum International.
Hauk M. (2010). The enactment of task design in telecollaboration 2.0. In ThomasM.ReindersH. (Eds.), Task-based learning and teaching with technology (pp. 197–217). London, UK: Continuum International.
Hurd S. (2005). Autonomy and the distance language learner. In HolmbergB.ShelleyM.WhiteC. (Eds.), Distance education and languages (pp. 1–19). Trowbridge, UK: Cromwell Press.
Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved March 5, 2012, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/HR2011.pdf
Kramsch C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford, UK: OUP.
Lancashire I. (2009). Introduction: Perspectives on online pedagogy. In I. Lancashire (Ed.), Teaching literature and language online (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: The Modern Language Association of America.
Martyniuk, W. (2006, May). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR) – a synopsis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Consortium for Language Teaching and Learning, Ithaca, NY.
Milton J. (2005). From parrots to puppet masters: Foster creative and authentic language use with online tools. In HolmbergB.ShelleyM.WhiteC. (Eds.), Distance education and languages (pp. 242–257). Trowbridge, UK: Cromwell Press.
Motteram G. Thomas M. (2010). Afterward: Future directions for technology-mediated tasks. In ThomasM.ReindersH. (Eds.), Task-based learning and teaching with technology (pp. 218–238). London, UK: Continuum International.
Pegrum, M. (2010). Emergent technologies in the classroom. Retrieved March 5, 2012, from http://www.education.uwa.edu.au/research/mark-pegrum
Pegrum M. (2011). Modified, multiplied, and (re-)mixed: Social media and digital literacies. In ThomasM. (Ed.), Digital education: Opportunities for social collaboration (pp. 9–35). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Richards J. Rodgers T. (2000). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ros i Solé C. Truman M. (2005). Feedback in distance language learning: Current practices and new directions. In HolmbergB.ShelleyM.WhiteC. (Eds.), Distance education and languages (pp. 72–91). Trowbridge, UK: Cromwell Press.
Sercu L. (2002). Autonomous learning and the acquisition of intercultural competence: Some implications for course development.Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 61–74. 10.1080/07908310208666633
Shelley M. Baumann U. (2005). Assessing intercultural competence in a German distance learning course. In HolmbergB.ShelleyM.WhiteC. (Eds.), Distance education and languages (pp. 119–139). Trowbridge, UK: Cromwell Press.
Warschauer M. (2006). Laptops and literacy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.