Employing a Critical Lens on Instructor Perceptions of Learning Games: Introduction to a Method

Employing a Critical Lens on Instructor Perceptions of Learning Games: Introduction to a Method

Scott J. Warren (Department of Learning Technologies, College of Information, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA) and Jonathan S. Gratch (University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA)
Copyright: © 2013 |Volume: 4 |Issue: 3 |Article: 1 |Pages: 17
ISSN: 1947-8518|EISSN: 1947-8526|DOI: 10.4018/jvple.2013070101
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Warren, Scott J. and Jonathan S. Gratch. "Employing a Critical Lens on Instructor Perceptions of Learning Games: Introduction to a Method." IJVPLE 4.3 (2013): 1-17. Web. 1 Jan. 2019. doi:10.4018/jvple.2013070101

APA

Warren, S. J., & Gratch, J. S. (2013). Employing a Critical Lens on Instructor Perceptions of Learning Games: Introduction to a Method. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 4(3), 1-17. doi:10.4018/jvple.2013070101

Chicago

Warren, Scott J. and Jonathan S. Gratch. "Employing a Critical Lens on Instructor Perceptions of Learning Games: Introduction to a Method," International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE) 4 (2013): 3, accessed (January 01, 2019), doi:10.4018/jvple.2013070101

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue PDF

Abstract

Digital games like Where in the World is Carmen San Diego and Oregon Trail have been used to support learning since the 1980s. However, the last decade has seen games, simulations and virtual world use take firm hold of the academic imagination. There also has been a rapid expansion of sponsored, formal research, informal inquiry, and a growing body of theory supporting the use of learning games. As a result, several challenges to their use have been identified such as flaws in the games themselves, inadequate methods of assessment due to complex, confounding variables, and the perceptions of students and teachers. How then can academics develop valid research methods that recognize such challenges and allow for strong claims regarding the impacts of such tools through the lived digital and classroom game experiences of learners and teachers? This article presents a description of one research method that seeks to provide one possible solution called Critical CinéEthnography. It stems from a discursive, systems-oriented view of learning that explores the arguments and truth claims made by learners and teachers. Beyond examining in-game discourse alone, the method employs video capture of out-of-game discussion, artifacts, and body language that should allow researchers to build a complex picture of participant experiences that can be easily shared with academics and practitioners alike. For additional context, a sample study is presented that investigated teacher perceptions and use of learning games.

References

Ang C. Rao G. (2008). Computer game theories for designing motivating educational software: A survey study.International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 181–199.
Asbell-Clark, J., Edwards, T., Larsen, J., Rowe, E., Sylvan, E., & Hewitt, J. (2011). Collaborative scientific inquiry in Arcadia: An MMO gaming environment on Blue Mars. In Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Baker, C. (2008, March 24, 2008). Trying to design a truly entertaining game can defeat even a certified genius. Wired, 16.
Baker R. Walonski J. Heffernan N. Roll I. Corbett A. Koedinger K. (2008). Why students engage in gaming the system behavior in interactive learning environments.Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 185–224.
Banathy B. (1992). A systems view of education: Concepts and principles for effective practice (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Barab S. Pettyjohn P. Gresafli M. Volk C. Solomou M. (2012). Game-based curriculum and transformational play: Designing to meaningfully position person, content, and context.Computers & Education, 58, 518–533. 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.001
Barab S. Scott B. Siyahhan S. Goldstone R. Ingram-Goble A. Zuiker S. Warren S. J. (2009). Transformational play as a curricular scaffold: Using videogames to support science education.Journal of Science Education and Technology. 10.1007/s10956-009-9171-5
Barab S. Thomas M. Dodge T. Carteaux R. Tuzun H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns.Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–107. 10.1007/BF02504859
Barab S. Zuiker S. Warren S. J. Hickey D. Ingram-Goble A. Kwon E.-J. Herring S. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts.Science Education, 91(5), 750–782. 10.1002/sce.20217
Baudrillard J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (The body. In theory: Histories of cultural materialism). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Becker K. Parker J. (2009). A simulation primer. In GibsonD.BaekY. (Eds.), Digital simulations for improving education. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978-1-60566-322-7.ch001
Bernstein, R. J. (1976). The restructuring of social and political theory (6th Paperback ed.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bernstein R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Carspecken P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Carspecken P. F. (1999). Four scenes for posing the question of meaning and other essays in critical philosophy and critical methodology. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Clark R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29. 10.1007/BF02299088
Davidson A. L. (1996). Making and molding identity in schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D., & Ruess, K. (2006). Designing for motivation and usability in a museum-based multi-user virtual environment. Retrieved March 11, 2006, from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~dedech/muvees/documents/AELppr.pdf
Defreitas S. Griffiths M. (2007). Online gaming as an educational tool in learning and training.British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 535–537. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00720.x
Elliot, J., Adams, L., & Bruckman, A. (2002, October 2002). No magic bullet: 3D video games in education. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Seattle, WA.
Galarneau L. Zibit M. (2007). Online games for 21st Century skills. In GibsonD.AldrichC.PrenskyM. (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks (pp. 59–88). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Gall M. D. Borg W. R. Gall J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed., Vol. I). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
Gee J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1145/950566.950595
Gibson D. Baek Y. (Eds.). (2009). Digital simulations for improving education: Learning through artificial teaching environments (1st ed.). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978-1-60566-322-7
Gratch, J. S., Warren, S. J., Najmi, A., Blackwell, D., Mills, L., Zhu, S. S., et al. (2011). A comparison of traditional expository narrative documentary and critical cine-ethnography products as research outcomes. In Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system (T. McCarthy, Trans. Vol. 2). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas J. (1998). On the pragmatics of communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas J. McCarthy T. (1981a). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system (Vol. 2). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas J. McCarthy T. (1981b). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hays R. T. (2005). The effectiveness of instructional games: A literature review and discussion (pp. 1–63). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.
Horn R. (Ed.). (1977). The guide to simulations/games for education and training (Vol. 1). Crawford, NJ: Didactic Systems.
Jones, G., & Warren, S. J. (2008). Intelligent agents and directed narratives: Overcoming the time factor in formal educational settings that use three-dimensional online learning environments. [Online - Peer Reviewed]. Innovate, 5(2).
Jones G. Warren S. J. (2011). Issues and concerns of K-12 educators on 3-D multi-user virtual environments in formal classroom settings.International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 3(1), 218–233. 10.4018/jgcms.2011010101
Kafai Y. Quintero M. Feldon D. (2010). Investigating the why in Whypox: Casual and systematic explorations of a virtual epidemic.Games and Culture, 5(1), 116–135. 10.1177/1555412009351265
Kebritchi M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers' adoption of educational computer games: A case study.British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256–270. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00921.x
Kenny R. McDaniel R. (2011). The role teachers' expectations and value assessments of video games play in their adopting and integrating them into their classrooms.British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 197–213. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01007.x
Konetes G. (2010). The function of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in educational virtual gams and simulations.Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 2(1), 23–26. 10.4304/jetwi.2.1.23-26
Kozma R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19. 10.1007/BF02299087
Lather P. A. Smithies C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Linn M. C. Clark D. (2003). Designing for knowledge integration: The impact of instructional time.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 451–493. 10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_1
McCabe J. Wise S. (2009). It's all fun and games until someone learns something: Assessing the learning outcomes of two educational games. Evidence Based Library and information. Practice, 4(4), 6–23.
Nieborg, D. B. (2005). Changing the rules of engagement: Tapping into the popular culture of America's Army, the official U.S. Army computer game. (Masters Study), Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, NL.
Pershing J. Warren S. J. Rowe D. (2006). Observation methods for HPT. In PershingJ. A. (Ed.), The handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Prensky M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Reese D. (2011). An instructional design approach to effective instructional game design and assessment. In OreyS.JonesA.BranchR. (Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 36). New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4614-1305-9_11
Reese D. Seward R. Harrison A. McFarland L. Hitt B. Tabachnick B. (in press). The moment of learning: Quantitative analysis of exemplary gameplay supports CyGaMEs approach to embedded assessment. In IfenthalerD.EseryelD.GeX. (Eds.), Assessment in game-based learning: Foundations, innovations, and perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.
Reiber L. Noah D. (2008). Games, simulations, and visual metaphors in education: Antagonism between enjoyment and learning.Educational Media International, 45(2), 77–92. 10.1080/09523980802107096
Robson C. (2002). Real world research. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Rogers E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY.
Rouch, J. (2003). Cine-ethnography (S. Fedl, Trans. 1st ed. Vol.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Ruby J. (2000). Picturing culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rupp A. A. Gushta M. Mislevy R. J. Shaffer D. W. (2010). Evidence-centered design of epistemic games: Measurement principles for complex learning environments.Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8(4), 3–47.
Salen K. Zimmerman E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Slattery P. (2006). Curriculum development in the postmodern era (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Squire, K. (2004). Replaying history: Learning world history through playing Civilization III. (Ph.D. Dissertation), Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN.
Steinkuehler C. (2007). Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices.E-learning, 4, 297–318. 10.2304/elea.2007.4.3.297
Steinkuehler C. Johnson B. Z. (2009). Computational literacy in online games: The social life of mods.International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 1, 53–65. 10.4018/jgcms.2009010104
Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warren, S. J. (2006). The impact of a multi-user virtual environment (MUVE) teacher instructional time, voluntary student writing practice, and student writing achievement. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
Warren, S. J. (2010). From the door, to broken window, to now: Design process, research, and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the Next Generation Course Redesign Project, University of North Texas.
Warren S. J. Barab S. Dondlinger M. (2008). A MUVE towards PBL writing: Effects of a digital learning environment designed to improve elementary student writing.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 113–140.
Warren, S. J., Dondlinger, M., Jones, G., & Whitworth, C. (2010). Leveraging PBL and game to redesign and introductory course. i-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1), 40-51.
Warren S. J. Dondlinger M. Stein R. Barab S. (2009). Educational game as supplemental learning tool: Benefits, challenges, and tensions arising from use in an elementary school classroom.Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(4), 487–505.
Warren, S. J., Gratch, J., Najmi, A., & Trussell, B. (2010). The 2015 project instructional design materials. LTEC 1100 Course Redesigns for Research. Denton, TX: ThinkTankTwo.
Warren, S. J., Gratch, J. S., Blackwell, D., Najmi, A., Zhu, S., Trombley, A., et al. (2011). Lived experiences of teachers and technology: A critical cine-ethnography documenting technology use in today's schools. In Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
Warren, S. J., & Jones, G. (2008). Yokoi’s theory of lateral innovation: Applications for learning game design [Special Issue on Educational Games]. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 32-43.
Warren S. J. Jones G. Trombley A. (2011). Skipping Pong and moving straight to World of Warcraft: The challenge of advancing educational game design models.International Journal for Web-Based Communities, 7(2), 218–233. 10.1504/IJWBC.2011.039512
Warren S. J. Jones J. Lin L. (2010). Usability and play testing: The oft missed element in serious games assessment. In AnnettaL.BronackS. (Eds.), Serious educational game assessment. Sense Publishers.
Warren S. J. Lin L. (2012). Ethical considerations in the design and use of educational games. Handbook of Research on Practices and Outcomes in Virtual Worlds and Environment. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Warren S. J. Stein R. A. Dondlinger M. J. Barab S. A. (2009). A look inside a MUVE design process: Blending instructional design and game principles to target writing skills.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40, 295–321. 10.2190/EC.40.3.c
Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs (Morningside Ed. ed. Vol. 1). New York, NY: Columbia University Press Morningside.
Yu T. (2009). Learning in the virtual world: The pedagogical potentials of massively multiplayer online role playing games.International Education Studies, 2, 32–38.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.