Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub1
Language as Social Institution: The Male-Centered IT Culture

Language as Social Institution: The Male-Centered IT Culture

Mary Kirk
Copyright: © 2009 |Pages: 24
ISBN13: 9781599047867|ISBN10: 1599047861|ISBN13 Softcover: 9781616924942|EISBN13: 9781599047881
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-786-7.ch005
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Mary Kirk. "Language as Social Institution: The Male-Centered IT Culture." Gender and Information Technology: Moving Beyond Access to Co-Create Global Partnership, IGI Global, 2009, pp.119-142. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-786-7.ch005

APA

M. Kirk (2009). Language as Social Institution: The Male-Centered IT Culture. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-786-7.ch005

Chicago

Mary Kirk. "Language as Social Institution: The Male-Centered IT Culture." In Gender and Information Technology: Moving Beyond Access to Co-Create Global Partnership. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-786-7.ch005

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Language as a social institution is the primary symbol system through which we teach/learn about our dominator culture. The assumptions, values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that are considered “normative” are deeply embedded in our language and communication style. The “language of domination” features “shoulds and musts, blame and criticism, [and] judgment and demand,” all of which privileges certain groups and suppresses others according to their “appropriate” social rank (Hart, 2004, p. 114). Language is also one of the powerful mechanisms for teaching and conveying stereotypes; the significant impact of which we have already explored. Further, without a great deal of mindful effort, the average person conforms to stereotypes of language and communication style without even being aware of it. Johnson (2006) describes how most of us learn to take the “path of least resistance” with regard to social expectations of ourselves and of others. This also points to the necessity for what feminist activists and scholars have called “consciousness raising.” Once we become conscious of the ways in which our language and communication style reflect dominator stereotypes that have taught us false models for how to think about ourselves and each other, we can make conscious choices to do things differently. This chapter explores the following concepts in an effort to chart the map down the “path of resistance” to a dominator social system: (1) why political correctness matters; (2) gendered communication style; (3) malecentered IT communication style and culture; and (4) dominance, violence, and sex metaphors in IT.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.