Reference Hub5
Type-One Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy

Type-One Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy

Ashu M. G. Solo, Madan M. Gupta, Noriyasu Homma, Zeng-Guang Hou
Copyright: © 2014 |Pages: 17
ISBN13: 9781466660625|ISBN10: 1466660627|EISBN13: 9781466660632
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6062-5.ch015
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Solo, Ashu M. G., et al. "Type-One Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy." Political Campaigning in the Information Age, edited by Ashu M. G. Solo, IGI Global, 2014, pp. 239-255. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6062-5.ch015

APA

Solo, A. M., Gupta, M. M., Homma, N., & Hou, Z. (2014). Type-One Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy. In A. Solo (Ed.), Political Campaigning in the Information Age (pp. 239-255). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6062-5.ch015

Chicago

Solo, Ashu M. G., et al. "Type-One Fuzzy Logic for Quantitatively Defining Imprecise Linguistic Terms in Politics and Public Policy." In Political Campaigning in the Information Age, edited by Ashu M. G. Solo, 239-255. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6062-5.ch015

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

During a presidential forum in the 2008 U.S. presidential campaign, the moderator, Pastor Rick Warren, wanted Senator John McCain and then-Senator Barack Obama to define “rich” with a specific number. Warren wanted to know at what specific income level a person goes from being not rich to rich. The problem with this question is that there is no specific income at which a person makes the leap from being not rich to being rich. This is because “rich” is a fuzzy set, not a crisp set, with different incomes having different degrees of membership in the “rich” fuzzy set. Similarly, “middle class” and “poor” are fuzzy sets. Fuzzy logic is needed to properly ask and answer Warren's question about quantitatively defining “rich.” Similarly, fuzzy logic is needed to properly ask and answer queries about quantitatively defining imprecise linguistic terms in politics and public policy like “middle class,” “poor,” “low inflation,” “medium inflation,” and “high inflation.” Imprecise terms like these in natural languages should be considered to have “qualitative definitions,” “quantitative definitions,” “crisp quantitative definitions,” and “fuzzy quantitative definitions.” This chapter provides much more information on the preceding.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.