Whose News Can You Trust?: A Framework for Evaluating the Credibility of Online News Sources for Diaspora Populations

Whose News Can You Trust?: A Framework for Evaluating the Credibility of Online News Sources for Diaspora Populations

Rick Malleus
ISBN13: 9781466661141|ISBN10: 1466661143|EISBN13: 9781466661158
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6114-1.ch015
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Malleus, Rick. "Whose News Can You Trust?: A Framework for Evaluating the Credibility of Online News Sources for Diaspora Populations." Digital Arts and Entertainment: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, 2014, pp. 324-352. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6114-1.ch015

APA

Malleus, R. (2014). Whose News Can You Trust?: A Framework for Evaluating the Credibility of Online News Sources for Diaspora Populations. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Digital Arts and Entertainment: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 324-352). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6114-1.ch015

Chicago

Malleus, Rick. "Whose News Can You Trust?: A Framework for Evaluating the Credibility of Online News Sources for Diaspora Populations." In Digital Arts and Entertainment: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, 324-352. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6114-1.ch015

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

This chapter proposes a framework for analyzing the credibility of online news sites, allowing diaspora populations to evaluate the credibility of online news about their home countries. A definition of credibility is established as a theoretical framework for analysis, and a framework of seven elements is developed based on the following elements: accuracy, authority, believability, quality of message construction, peer review, comparison, and corroboration. Later, those elements are applied to a variety of online news sources available to the Zimbabwean diaspora that serves as a case study for explaining the framework. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the framework in relation to some contextual circumstances of diaspora populations and presents some limitations of the framework as diaspora populations might actually apply the different elements.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.