Reference Hub1
A Corpus-Based Comparison of Self-Reflection Modalities in Process-Oriented Translator Training

A Corpus-Based Comparison of Self-Reflection Modalities in Process-Oriented Translator Training

Erik Angelone
ISBN13: 9781466666153|ISBN10: 1466666153|EISBN13: 9781466666160
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6615-3.ch018
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Angelone, Erik. "A Corpus-Based Comparison of Self-Reflection Modalities in Process-Oriented Translator Training." Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation, edited by Ying Cui and Wei Zhao, IGI Global, 2015, pp. 346-361. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6615-3.ch018

APA

Angelone, E. (2015). A Corpus-Based Comparison of Self-Reflection Modalities in Process-Oriented Translator Training. In Y. Cui & W. Zhao (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation (pp. 346-361). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6615-3.ch018

Chicago

Angelone, Erik. "A Corpus-Based Comparison of Self-Reflection Modalities in Process-Oriented Translator Training." In Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation, edited by Ying Cui and Wei Zhao, 346-361. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6615-3.ch018

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

In recent years, process-oriented translator training has gained popularity among trainers and trainees alike, thanks to new, user-friendly pedagogical tools geared towards fostering cognizance of problems and problem-solving. This chapter reports on a corpus-based exploratory study that set out to document variation in student problem-solving discourse when utilizing Integrated Problem and Decision Reporting logs and screen recordings as self-reflection tools. Variation was observed between the two self-reflection modalities, particularly in the domains of the textual level and locus (comprehension, transfer, or production) of problem solving. The discourse generated by students when using screen recording for self-reflection is suggestive of a multi-layered, granular approach, which may, in part, shed light on why screen-recording analysis has proven to be particularly efficacious for the purposes of error detection and mitigation.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.