Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions: A Deliberative Process

Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions: A Deliberative Process

Tarik Abdel-Monem, Mitchel N. Herian, Nancy Shank
Copyright: © 2015 |Pages: 22
ISBN13: 9781466683587|ISBN10: 1466683589|EISBN13: 9781466683594
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch102
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Abdel-Monem, Tarik, et al. "Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions: A Deliberative Process." Public Affairs and Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, 2015, pp. 1987-2008. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch102

APA

Abdel-Monem, T., Herian, M. N., & Shank, N. (2015). Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions: A Deliberative Process. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Public Affairs and Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1987-2008). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch102

Chicago

Abdel-Monem, Tarik, Mitchel N. Herian, and Nancy Shank. "Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions: A Deliberative Process." In Public Affairs and Administration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, 1987-2008. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Public attitudes about electronic medical records (EMRs) have been primarily gauged by one-time opinion polls. The authors investigated the impact of an interactive deliberative polling process on general attitudes towards EMRs and perceptions of governmental roles in the area. An initial online survey was conducted about EMRs among a sample of respondents (n = 138), and then surveyed a sub-sample after they had engaged in a deliberative discussion about EMR issues with peers and policymakers (n = 24). Significant changes in opinions about EMRs and governmental roles were found following the deliberative discussion. Overall support for EMRs increased significantly, although concerns about security and confidentiality remained. This indicates that one way to address concerns about EMRs is to provide opportunities for deliberation with policymakers. The policy and theoretical implications of these findings are briefly discussed within.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.