Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub1
Does Participation in International R&D Networks Enhance Local Dynamism?

Does Participation in International R&D Networks Enhance Local Dynamism?

Hüseyin Güler, Erkan Erdil
Copyright: © 2015 |Pages: 30
ISBN13: 9781466685987|ISBN10: 1466685980|EISBN13: 9781466685994
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-8598-7.ch009
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Güler, Hüseyin, and Erkan Erdil. "Does Participation in International R&D Networks Enhance Local Dynamism?." Handbook of Research on Cultural and Economic Impacts of the Information Society, edited by P.E. Thomas, et al., IGI Global, 2015, pp. 203-232. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8598-7.ch009

APA

Güler, H. & Erdil, E. (2015). Does Participation in International R&D Networks Enhance Local Dynamism?. In P. Thomas, M. Srihari, & S. Kaur (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Cultural and Economic Impacts of the Information Society (pp. 203-232). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8598-7.ch009

Chicago

Güler, Hüseyin, and Erkan Erdil. "Does Participation in International R&D Networks Enhance Local Dynamism?." In Handbook of Research on Cultural and Economic Impacts of the Information Society, edited by P.E. Thomas, M. Srihari, and Sandeep Kaur, 203-232. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8598-7.ch009

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

This chapter which is in line with the global pipelines-local buzz framework addresses the collaboration dynamics of ICT researchers from universities of an emerging economy who are mostly benefiting from national funds and do not have dominating or core roles in international R&D networks. It provides a novel taxonomy to identify the degree of globalisation versus localisation of ICT scientists in Turkey. Based on international and national project portfolios of Turkish ICT researchers who participated in FP6 and other international projects between 2003 and 2006, four groups (gatekeepers, externally oriented researchers, internally oriented researchers, inactive researchers) were formed in terms of their degree of local or global focus. For the period of 2007–2013, the performance of the same population was traced with respect to its international or national project density, publication output, involvement in decision making processes on academic project funding, and contribution to R&D capacity development in the private sector. Findings show that that most of the researchers who are engaged in international collaboration are also locally active and they seem to be the most productive actors within the four groups. The study also implies that having a strong project portfolio at both national and international levels relates to having a work experience abroad after the PhD fulfilment and being at a university with advanced research ecosystem in Turkey. This chapter concludes with key policy recommendations, highlighting the need on moving beyond one-size-fits-all policies which should take in to account the heterogeneity, differentiation on career levels, national priorities and capacity requirements of the research ecosystem.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.