Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Feral Government?: The Limitations of Critical Success Factors in the Context of Major Government IT Projects

Feral Government?: The Limitations of Critical Success Factors in the Context of Major Government IT Projects

Annie Maddison
Copyright: © 2016 |Pages: 19
ISBN13: 9781466694613|ISBN10: 1466694610|EISBN13: 9781466694620
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9461-3.ch071
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Maddison, Annie. "Feral Government?: The Limitations of Critical Success Factors in the Context of Major Government IT Projects." Politics and Social Activism: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, 2016, pp. 1375-1393. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9461-3.ch071

APA

Maddison, A. (2016). Feral Government?: The Limitations of Critical Success Factors in the Context of Major Government IT Projects. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Politics and Social Activism: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1375-1393). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9461-3.ch071

Chicago

Maddison, Annie. "Feral Government?: The Limitations of Critical Success Factors in the Context of Major Government IT Projects." In Politics and Social Activism: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, 1375-1393. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9461-3.ch071

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Using workflow technologies as a metaphor for Critical Success Factors (CSFs), this chapter considers their use to improve the performance of major government IT projects, asking whether context can be ignored without repercussion or whether it is highly significant. Focusing on the UK, this exploration begins by defining “context,” then considering what it means in terms of government. A case study demonstrates that context limits the value of CSFs to a major government IT project. Whilst claiming to submit to the imposed workflow technology, the project team developed feral behaviour, manipulating the CSFs to match previous ways of working with no action being taken to ensure compliance. However, increased governance is not the answer. It would simply force these generic solutions on to unique problems; more contingent solutions should be sought to the problem of IT project failure in order to take these highly specific contexts into account.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.