Analysis, Critique, and Proposed Revision of Crew Resource Management for Cockpit Automation: The R-MPM and ERICA

Analysis, Critique, and Proposed Revision of Crew Resource Management for Cockpit Automation: The R-MPM and ERICA

ISBN13: 9781522501961|ISBN10: 1522501967|EISBN13: 9781522501978
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0196-1.ch016
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Lofaro, Ronald John. "Analysis, Critique, and Proposed Revision of Crew Resource Management for Cockpit Automation: The R-MPM and ERICA." Project Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, 2016, pp. 329-358. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0196-1.ch016

APA

Lofaro, R. J. (2016). Analysis, Critique, and Proposed Revision of Crew Resource Management for Cockpit Automation: The R-MPM and ERICA. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Project Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 329-358). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0196-1.ch016

Chicago

Lofaro, Ronald John. "Analysis, Critique, and Proposed Revision of Crew Resource Management for Cockpit Automation: The R-MPM and ERICA." In Project Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, 329-358. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0196-1.ch016

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

It is well over 30 years since the first (then called) Cockpit Resource Management (CRM) training, now called crew resource management was introduced. It is a shibboleth, a sacred cow as it were, despite many issues, concerns, and changes over the years. Some 21 years ago, 1992, an Air Transport Association (ATA)/Federal Aviation Association (FAA)-Sponsored Workshop was convened in an attempt to deal with some specific CRM issues. Yet the issues and needs as articulated in that workshop, and some newer ones, remain. Thus, this chapter is 21 years overdue, leading to the questions: Why now and is it still relevant? As said, some needs, issues, and concerns remain. The relevancy is that both a critique of civil aviation CRM on many levels and a comparison with current USAF, USCG, and USN CRM are presented. The proposed skeletal template for the long-overdue revision of civil aviation CRM, the R-MPM is shown. Next, a new model for an intelligent cockpit automated decision aid/advisory system, Event Response Integrated Decision Advisories (ERICA), is shown. ERICA came about from 2009-2012 work in automated decision-making tools for the cockpit and the realization that the Revised Mission Performance Model (R-MPM) and ERICA were interrelated.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.