Facilitating Technology Integration

Facilitating Technology Integration

David C. Ensminger
Copyright: © 2008 |Pages: 8
ISBN13: 9781599048819|ISBN10: 1599048817|EISBN13: 9781599048826
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-881-9.ch055
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Ensminger, David C. "Facilitating Technology Integration." Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration, edited by Lawrence A. Tomei, IGI Global, 2008, pp. 332-339. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-881-9.ch055

APA

Ensminger, D. C. (2008). Facilitating Technology Integration. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration (pp. 332-339). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-881-9.ch055

Chicago

Ensminger, David C. "Facilitating Technology Integration." In Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration, edited by Lawrence A. Tomei, 332-339. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-881-9.ch055

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

The use of instructional technology is not new. During WWII, films were used as instructional media to train new recruits. The use of film as an instructional technology for training military personnel in WWII prompted the investigation of technology applications in formal educational settings. In the years following WWII, researchers began to study the applications of instructional technology in the classroom, as well as conduct studies on its effectiveness (Reiser 2002). Although technology has changed in the ensuing years and educators have access to many technologies, the integration of technology into the classroom has been slow (Cuban, Kirkpatrick, & Peck; 2001; Culp, Honey, & Mandinach; 2005; Hernández-Ramos, 2005) and its reported effectiveness on student learning and achievement has been mixed (Honey, Macmillan, & Carrigg, 1999; Keller & Bichelmeyer, 2004). The slow rate of integration is often explained from a technology evolutionary perspective, (Cuban et. al., 2001) that purports that with increased availability and access to technology, integration will occur naturally with time, or from technology determinist perspective (Surry & Land, 2000) that proposes that technology integration occurs when a technology is developed to meet a specific need, (i.e., if you build a better mousetrap it will be used). Although these two perspectives might explain some technology integration in society, they fail to provide a reasonable explanation for the lack of technology integration in classrooms. In order to understand why integration has been slow and often times fails to meet intended outcomes, we must adopt an instrumentalist’s perspective to technology integration. This perspective considers the human factors related to technology integration, and proposes that integration is more a human endeavor than a natural process. (Surry & Land, 2000). I extend this perspective to include organizational and environmental factors that impact technology integration. This paper will examine the variables that impact technology implementation, and present two approaches that school systems could employ to facilitate the integration of technology.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.