Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub1
Towards an Objective Assessment Framework for Linked Data Quality: Enriching Dataset Profiles With Quality Indicators

Towards an Objective Assessment Framework for Linked Data Quality: Enriching Dataset Profiles With Quality Indicators

Ahmad Assaf, Aline Senart, Raphaël Troncy
Copyright: © 2018 |Pages: 26
ISBN13: 9781522551911|ISBN10: 1522551913|EISBN13: 9781522551928
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5191-1.ch021
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Assaf, Ahmad, et al. "Towards an Objective Assessment Framework for Linked Data Quality: Enriching Dataset Profiles With Quality Indicators." Information Retrieval and Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, 2018, pp. 453-478. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5191-1.ch021

APA

Assaf, A., Senart, A., & Troncy, R. (2018). Towards an Objective Assessment Framework for Linked Data Quality: Enriching Dataset Profiles With Quality Indicators. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Information Retrieval and Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 453-478). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5191-1.ch021

Chicago

Assaf, Ahmad, Aline Senart, and Raphaël Troncy. "Towards an Objective Assessment Framework for Linked Data Quality: Enriching Dataset Profiles With Quality Indicators." In Information Retrieval and Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, 453-478. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5191-1.ch021

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Ensuring data quality in Linked Open Data is a complex process as it consists of structured information supported by models, ontologies and vocabularies and contains queryable endpoints and links. In this paper, the authors first propose an objective assessment framework for Linked Data quality. The authors build upon previous efforts that have identified potential quality issues but focus only on objective quality indicators that can measured regardless on the underlying use case. Secondly, the authors present an extensible quality measurement tool that helps on one hand data owners to rate the quality of their datasets, and on the other hand data consumers to choose their data sources from a ranked set. The authors evaluate this tool by measuring the quality of the LOD cloud. The results demonstrate that the general state of the datasets needs attention as they mostly have low completeness, provenance, licensing and comprehensibility quality scores.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.