Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
The “Intensification-Quality Paradox” in ICT Organizations

The “Intensification-Quality Paradox” in ICT Organizations

Solveig Beyza Narli Evenstad
Copyright: © 2018 |Pages: 36
ISBN13: 9781522559962|ISBN10: 1522559965|EISBN13: 9781522559979
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5996-2.ch006
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Evenstad, Solveig Beyza Narli. "The “Intensification-Quality Paradox” in ICT Organizations." Systems Research for Real-World Challenges, edited by Frank Stowell, IGI Global, 2018, pp. 176-211. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5996-2.ch006

APA

Evenstad, S. B. (2018). The “Intensification-Quality Paradox” in ICT Organizations. In F. Stowell (Ed.), Systems Research for Real-World Challenges (pp. 176-211). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5996-2.ch006

Chicago

Evenstad, Solveig Beyza Narli. "The “Intensification-Quality Paradox” in ICT Organizations." In Systems Research for Real-World Challenges, edited by Frank Stowell, 176-211. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5996-2.ch006

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Paradoxes and system contradictions in organizations may expose employees to tensions and contradictions, which they can only partially resolve, and from which they may only partially escape. Exposure to double-bind situations leads to stress, anxiety, and other symptoms of behavioral, affective, and cognitive disturbances. When employees are caught between paradoxical injunctions and organizational defensive routines hinder metacommunication, some employees develop dysfunctional coping strategies and end up being burned out. During a phenomenological PhD research on the burnout experience of 14 ICT employees in France and Norway, a stress-inducing pathological communication pattern was discovered and named the “intensification-quality paradox.” The research participants had experienced two conflicting demands as a double bind: “do more with less” and “be excellent.” The employees with high standards and ideals spent excessive personal energy to do more with less while keeping the quality constant. They got increasingly exhausted, ineffective, and finally burnt out.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.