Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub183
Understanding a Revolutionary and Flawed Grand Experiment in Blockchain: The DAO Attack

Understanding a Revolutionary and Flawed Grand Experiment in Blockchain: The DAO Attack

Muhammad Izhar Mehar, Charles Louis Shier, Alana Giambattista, Elgar Gong, Gabrielle Fletcher, Ryan Sanayhie, Henry M. Kim, Marek Laskowski
Copyright: © 2019 |Volume: 21 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 14
ISSN: 1548-7717|EISSN: 1548-7725|EISBN13: 9781522563860|DOI: 10.4018/JCIT.2019010102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Mehar, Muhammad Izhar, et al. "Understanding a Revolutionary and Flawed Grand Experiment in Blockchain: The DAO Attack." JCIT vol.21, no.1 2019: pp.19-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2019010102

APA

Mehar, M. I., Shier, C. L., Giambattista, A., Gong, E., Fletcher, G., Sanayhie, R., Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2019). Understanding a Revolutionary and Flawed Grand Experiment in Blockchain: The DAO Attack. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 21(1), 19-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2019010102

Chicago

Mehar, Muhammad Izhar, et al. "Understanding a Revolutionary and Flawed Grand Experiment in Blockchain: The DAO Attack," Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT) 21, no.1: 19-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2019010102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

In spring 2016, the Distributed Autonomous Organization (The DAO) was created on Ethereum. As with Bitcoin, Ethereum uses a P2P network, where distributed ledgers are implemented as daisy-chained blocks of data. Ethereum's native cryptocurrency, Ethers are spent to execute pieces of code called smart contracts. Investors paid their Ethers for the DAO to operate and received the opportunity to vote on and become investors in venture projects proposed by Ethereum-based startups. Transactions and settlements between investors and startups are executed autonomously. The DAO experiment failed shortly after inception as an anonymous hacker stole over $50M USD worth of Ethers out of the $168M invested. The Ethereum community voted to return (or fork) the state of the network to one prior to the hack, returning Ethers back to investors and shuttering the DAO. However, this action arguably represented as a bailout—ironically, Bitcoin was conceived as a reaction against the 2008 bailout of US banks—and violated the ledger immutability and “code is law” ethos of the blockchain community.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.