Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Shared Practices in Articulating and Sharing Rationale: An Empirical Study

Shared Practices in Articulating and Sharing Rationale: An Empirical Study

Lu Xiao, John M. Carroll
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 30
ISBN13: 9781522583622|ISBN10: 1522583629|EISBN13: 9781522583639
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch081
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Xiao, Lu, and John M. Carroll. "Shared Practices in Articulating and Sharing Rationale: An Empirical Study." Crowdsourcing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, 2019, pp. 1606-1635. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch081

APA

Xiao, L. & Carroll, J. M. (2019). Shared Practices in Articulating and Sharing Rationale: An Empirical Study. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Crowdsourcing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1606-1635). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch081

Chicago

Xiao, Lu, and John M. Carroll. "Shared Practices in Articulating and Sharing Rationale: An Empirical Study." In Crowdsourcing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, 1606-1635. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch081

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

This paper reports a classroom study in which group learners brainstormed ideas in virtual group space and justified their ideas through articulating their rationales in the shared rationale space. The investigation focused on the learners' practices of articulating and sharing rationales. The results suggest that group members would brainstorm the ideas and generate rationales to justify the ideas before reading the others' ideas and rationales. Also, the members in general brainstormed all the ideas first and then elaborated the rationales to justify the ideas; and grouped the shared rationales according to their authors. The group members' reasoning styles were examined by using Rhetorical Structure Theory to analyze the shared rationales. It was found that similar reasoning styles existed across the groups. Additionally, the group context seemed to have affected the members' strategies of using contextual and additional information to justify their ideas. Several design implications are presented to support the practices of articulating and sharing rationales in virtual group workspace. The authors also articulate how their work contributes to other research areas such as project management, crowdsourcing, and online deliberation. Based on their study, the authors argue for a rationale-based knowledge management approach to complex collective activities in the online environment.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.