Constructivist Strategies to Optimize Four Levels of Interaction in a Distributed Learning Environment: A Case Study

Constructivist Strategies to Optimize Four Levels of Interaction in a Distributed Learning Environment: A Case Study

Linda Lohr, Nicholas Eastham, David Kendrick
ISBN13: 9781605666549|ISBN10: 1605666548|EISBN13: 9781605666556
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch016
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Lohr, Linda, et al. "Constructivist Strategies to Optimize Four Levels of Interaction in a Distributed Learning Environment: A Case Study." Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks, edited by Carla R. Payne, IGI Global, 2009, pp. 247-261. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch016

APA

Lohr, L., Eastham, N., & Kendrick, D. (2009). Constructivist Strategies to Optimize Four Levels of Interaction in a Distributed Learning Environment: A Case Study. In C. Payne (Ed.), Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks (pp. 247-261). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch016

Chicago

Lohr, Linda, Nicholas Eastham, and David Kendrick. "Constructivist Strategies to Optimize Four Levels of Interaction in a Distributed Learning Environment: A Case Study." In Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks, edited by Carla R. Payne, 247-261. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch016

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

This case study describes how a constructivist theory of learning guided the design of distributed learning environment for a three credit hour graduate level course on instructional design. Four types of interaction data were collected from 27 participants, one instructional designer/instructor, and two assistant designers. Overall, constructivist strategies appeared to contribute to a successful learning experience as measured by participant surveys, designer observations, and academic performance. A strong majority of students considered a number of constructivist strategies beneficial, such as the provision of a variety of reading and learning activity options, as well as participation in an authentic and relevant learning task. Academic quality of end of semester instructional products was high. A strong majority of participants received a rating of excellent, as determined by designer/instructor and mentor evaluations. Some constructivist strategies appeared to detract from the learning experience. Data related student-to-student, student-to-content, student-to-teacher, and student-to-interface interaction suggests the need to clarify expectations for small group discussions and participant blogs, rewriting or repositioning an instructional story as a case study, increasing design-document specific feedback, using a broad and shallow interface structure and moving selected course content to pre-packaged paper-based format to reduce cognitive demands related to reading while online.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.