Reference Hub2
E-Mail Worm Detection Using Data Mining

E-Mail Worm Detection Using Data Mining

Mohammad M. Masud, Latifur Khan, Bhavani Thuraisingham
Copyright: © 2007 |Volume: 1 |Issue: 4 |Pages: 15
ISSN: 1930-1650|EISSN: 1930-1669|ISSN: 1930-1650|EISBN13: 9781615203284|EISSN: 1930-1669|DOI: 10.4018/jisp.2007100103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Masud, Mohammad M., et al. "E-Mail Worm Detection Using Data Mining." IJISP vol.1, no.4 2007: pp.47-61. http://doi.org/10.4018/jisp.2007100103

APA

Masud, M. M., Khan, L., & Thuraisingham, B. (2007). E-Mail Worm Detection Using Data Mining. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy (IJISP), 1(4), 47-61. http://doi.org/10.4018/jisp.2007100103

Chicago

Masud, Mohammad M., Latifur Khan, and Bhavani Thuraisingham. "E-Mail Worm Detection Using Data Mining," International Journal of Information Security and Privacy (IJISP) 1, no.4: 47-61. http://doi.org/10.4018/jisp.2007100103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This work applies data mining techniques to detect e-mail worms. E-mail messages contain a number of different features such as the total number of words in message body/subject, presence/absence of binary attachments, type of attachments, and so on. The goal is to obtain an efficient classification model based on these features. The solution consists of several steps. First, the number of features is reduced using two different approaches: feature-selection and dimension-reduction. This step is necessary to reduce noise and redundancy from the data. The feature-selection technique is called Two-phase Selection (TPS), which is a novel combination of decision tree and greedy selection algorithm. The dimension-reduction is performed by Principal Component Analysis. Second, the reduced data is used to train a classifier. Different classification techniques have been used, such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes, and their combination. Finally, the trained classifiers are tested on a dataset containing both known and unknown types of worms. These results have been compared with published results. It is found that the proposed TPS selection along with SVM classification achieves the best accuracy in detecting both known and unknown types of worms.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.