Reference Hub2
Testing the Validity of the Post and Vote Model of Web-Based Peer Assessment

Testing the Validity of the Post and Vote Model of Web-Based Peer Assessment

Bruce L. Mann
ISBN13: 9781591407478|ISBN10: 1591407478|ISBN13 Softcover: 9781591407485|EISBN13: 9781591407492
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-747-8.ch009
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Mann, Bruce L. "Testing the Validity of the Post and Vote Model of Web-Based Peer Assessment." Online Assessment, Measurement and Evaluation: Emerging Practices, edited by David Williams, et al., IGI Global, 2006, pp. 131-152. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-747-8.ch009

APA

Mann, B. L. (2006). Testing the Validity of the Post and Vote Model of Web-Based Peer Assessment. In D. Williams, M. Hricko, & S. Howell (Eds.), Online Assessment, Measurement and Evaluation: Emerging Practices (pp. 131-152). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-747-8.ch009

Chicago

Mann, Bruce L. "Testing the Validity of the Post and Vote Model of Web-Based Peer Assessment." In Online Assessment, Measurement and Evaluation: Emerging Practices, edited by David Williams, Mary Hricko, and Scott L. Howell, 131-152. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2006. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-747-8.ch009

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Two tests of validity were conducted with undergraduate education students on a method of online peer assessment called post and vote. Validity was determined by calculating a Pearson product-moment correlation and corresponding coefficient of determination that compared the average grade assigned by the pre-service teachers with the grade assigned independently by the course instructor. Results of both studies showed that post and vote Web-based peer assessment was valid with these groups, and generalizable to undergraduate classes engaged in similar tasks.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.