Reference Hub2
Can You Feel It?: Effectiveness of Anxiety Cues for the Design of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

Can You Feel It?: Effectiveness of Anxiety Cues for the Design of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy

Jessica Morton, Jolien De Letter, Anissa All, Tine Daeseleire, Barbara Depreeuw, Kim Haesen, Lieven De Marez, Klaas Bombeke
Copyright: © 2021 |Volume: 5 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 17
ISSN: 2473-537X|EISSN: 2473-5388|EISBN13: 9781799863090|DOI: 10.4018/IJVAR.2021070102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Morton, Jessica, et al. "Can You Feel It?: Effectiveness of Anxiety Cues for the Design of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy." IJVAR vol.5, no.2 2021: pp.1-17. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJVAR.2021070102

APA

Morton, J., De Letter, J., All, A., Daeseleire, T., Depreeuw, B., Haesen, K., De Marez, L., & Bombeke, K. (2021). Can You Feel It?: Effectiveness of Anxiety Cues for the Design of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy. International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality (IJVAR), 5(2), 1-17. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJVAR.2021070102

Chicago

Morton, Jessica, et al. "Can You Feel It?: Effectiveness of Anxiety Cues for the Design of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy," International Journal of Virtual and Augmented Reality (IJVAR) 5, no.2: 1-17. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJVAR.2021070102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) has been widely acknowledged as an effective alternative for in vivo exposure therapy (iVET). So far, previous research focused on long- and short-term effectiveness and comparisons to iVET, whereas the impact of design choices is understudied. Hence, the present study focuses on the effectiveness of several types of anxiety cues for the manipulation of anxiety. More specifically, five interoceptive cues (i.e., “fake” bodily sensations for tunnel vision, light flickering, heartbeat audio, blurred vision, and dizziness) and a physical cue (i.e., heat stimulation) are implemented in the VRET design of a within-subjects experiment with people who have claustrophobic and panic tendencies (N = 24). Results show that adding interoceptive cues significantly increased reported levels of anxiety, independent of the type of interoceptive cue. However, introducing a physical cue in VRET can also be effective but has no real added value when combined. Studies focusing on the design of anxiety cues can be valuable in understanding the effectiveness of VRET.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.