Reference Hub3
What Lecturers Say Helps and Hinders Their Use of a Virtual Learning Environment to Support Face-to-Face Teaching

What Lecturers Say Helps and Hinders Their Use of a Virtual Learning Environment to Support Face-to-Face Teaching

Sue Moron-Garcia
Copyright: © 2006 |Pages: 19
ISBN13: 9781591409625|ISBN10: 1591409624|ISBN13 Softcover: 9781591409632|EISBN13: 9781591409649
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-962-5.ch003
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Moron-Garcia, Sue. "What Lecturers Say Helps and Hinders Their Use of a Virtual Learning Environment to Support Face-to-Face Teaching." Technology Supported Learning and Teaching: A Staff Perspective, edited by John O'Donoghue, IGI Global, 2006, pp. 15-33. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-962-5.ch003

APA

Moron-Garcia, S. (2006). What Lecturers Say Helps and Hinders Their Use of a Virtual Learning Environment to Support Face-to-Face Teaching. In J. O'Donoghue (Ed.), Technology Supported Learning and Teaching: A Staff Perspective (pp. 15-33). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-962-5.ch003

Chicago

Moron-Garcia, Sue. "What Lecturers Say Helps and Hinders Their Use of a Virtual Learning Environment to Support Face-to-Face Teaching." In Technology Supported Learning and Teaching: A Staff Perspective, edited by John O'Donoghue, 15-33. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2006. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-962-5.ch003

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of issues lecturers said they faced when using a virtual learning environment (VLE), such as WebCT or Blackboard, to support their face-to-face teaching. It draws on data collected for doctoral research that explored the reasons lecturers gave for their use of a VLE, the teaching approach supported, and the factors affecting this use. It concentrates on the latter and as such contributes to an under-researched area by reporting the subjective views of academics who have adopted information and communications technology (ICT) to support their teaching. Four sets of issues were identified: student, technical, pedagogic, and institutional. These are summarised and discussed with reference to comments made by interviewees, and the implications for different audiences are outlined.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.