Strategic Pathway Determination for a State Hospital in Terms of an Integrated Facility Management System

Strategic Pathway Determination for a State Hospital in Terms of an Integrated Facility Management System

ISBN13: 9781668481035|ISBN10: 1668481030|EISBN13: 9781668481042
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8103-5.ch024
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Gedikli, Erman, and Yeter Demir Uslu. "Strategic Pathway Determination for a State Hospital in Terms of an Integrated Facility Management System." Handbook of Research on Quality and Competitiveness in the Healthcare Services Sector, edited by Ulas Akkucuk, IGI Global, 2023, pp. 404-438. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8103-5.ch024

APA

Gedikli, E. & Uslu, Y. D. (2023). Strategic Pathway Determination for a State Hospital in Terms of an Integrated Facility Management System. In U. Akkucuk (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Quality and Competitiveness in the Healthcare Services Sector (pp. 404-438). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8103-5.ch024

Chicago

Gedikli, Erman, and Yeter Demir Uslu. "Strategic Pathway Determination for a State Hospital in Terms of an Integrated Facility Management System." In Handbook of Research on Quality and Competitiveness in the Healthcare Services Sector, edited by Ulas Akkucuk, 404-438. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8103-5.ch024

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop strategies to provide effective, efficient, and patient safety facility management in a public hospital. Exploratory sequential mixed method research design was employed. Quantitative approaches were used in the second stage of the investigation after qualitative methods in the first stage. The universe of the research consists of all the staff. The criterion sampling technique was applied during the qualitative phase. In the first phase 39 managers were interviewed individually as part of data collection process. To assess the priority of the need group, the AHP questionnaire was used to seven managers in ultimate decision-making positions during the second phase of data collecting. Finally, decision-makers should prioritize taking action to address the needs identified under the respective topics of emergency preparedness and business continuity, human factors, and communication, respectively. The environmental management and sustainability was determined as the last priority group.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.