Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Evaluating the Conflicting Interests in the United Nations: Comparative Analysis of UN Resolutions Policy Output Regarding Conflict-Related Violence (CRSV)

Evaluating the Conflicting Interests in the United Nations: Comparative Analysis of UN Resolutions Policy Output Regarding Conflict-Related Violence (CRSV)

Rajiv Ranjan, Pranjal Khare
Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 25
ISBN13: 9781668484128|ISBN10: 1668484129|ISBN13 Softcover: 9781668484135|EISBN13: 9781668484142
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8412-8.ch011
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Ranjan, Rajiv, and Pranjal Khare. "Evaluating the Conflicting Interests in the United Nations: Comparative Analysis of UN Resolutions Policy Output Regarding Conflict-Related Violence (CRSV)." Handbook of Research on Exploring Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Through an Intersectional Lens, edited by Eleni Meletiadou, IGI Global, 2023, pp. 211-235. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8412-8.ch011

APA

Ranjan, R. & Khare, P. (2023). Evaluating the Conflicting Interests in the United Nations: Comparative Analysis of UN Resolutions Policy Output Regarding Conflict-Related Violence (CRSV). In E. Meletiadou (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Exploring Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Through an Intersectional Lens (pp. 211-235). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8412-8.ch011

Chicago

Ranjan, Rajiv, and Pranjal Khare. "Evaluating the Conflicting Interests in the United Nations: Comparative Analysis of UN Resolutions Policy Output Regarding Conflict-Related Violence (CRSV)." In Handbook of Research on Exploring Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Through an Intersectional Lens, edited by Eleni Meletiadou, 211-235. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8412-8.ch011

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

The chapter sheds light on the sophisticated competing interests in the United Nations (UN) system. These can be found in the organization's policies, which are related to conflict- related violence (CRSV) and sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) by the UN. In a systematic and by taking qualitative starting point, the authors compared the prior criticism associated with SEA. The authors focused on nuance and an individualistic approach. The UN resolutions from the abovementioned policy areas are analyzed in a structured and focused comparison. This comparative case study aims to make visible contradictions and accompanying problems between the UN's interests by placing policies concerning SEA in a larger context. By comparing policies for both SEA and conflict-related violence (CRSV), the study seeks to show how conflicts between priorities can be seen in policies.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.