Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub8
A Comparative Analysis of Major ERP Life Cycle Implementation, Management and Support Issues in Queensland Government

A Comparative Analysis of Major ERP Life Cycle Implementation, Management and Support Issues in Queensland Government

She-I Chang, Guy G. Gable
Copyright: © 2002 |Volume: 10 |Issue: 3 |Pages: 19
ISSN: 1062-7375|EISSN: 1533-7995|ISSN: 1062-7375|EISBN13: 9781615201419|EISSN: 1533-7995|DOI: 10.4018/jgim.2002070103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Chang, She-I, and Guy G. Gable. "A Comparative Analysis of Major ERP Life Cycle Implementation, Management and Support Issues in Queensland Government." JGIM vol.10, no.3 2002: pp.36-54. http://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2002070103

APA

Chang, S. & Gable, G. G. (2002). A Comparative Analysis of Major ERP Life Cycle Implementation, Management and Support Issues in Queensland Government. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 10(3), 36-54. http://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2002070103

Chicago

Chang, She-I, and Guy G. Gable. "A Comparative Analysis of Major ERP Life Cycle Implementation, Management and Support Issues in Queensland Government," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM) 10, no.3: 36-54. http://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2002070103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This paper reports on a study of issues across the ERP life cycle from the perspectives of individuals with substantial and diverse involvement with SAP Financials in Queensland Government. A survey was conducted of 117 ERP system project participants in five closely related state government agencies. Through a modified Delphi technique, the study inventoried, synthesized, then weighted perceived major-issues in ongoing ERP life cycle implementation, management, and support. The five agencies each implemented SAP Financials simultaneously using a common implementation partner. The three Delphi survey rounds, together with a series of interviews and domain experts’ workshops, resulted in a set of 10 major-issue categories with 38 sub-issues. Sub-issue weights are compared between strategic and operational personnel within the agencies in order to understand where the organizations should focus their resources in order to avoid, minimise, or eliminate these issues. Study findings confirm the importance of this finer partitioning of the data, and distinctions identified reflect the unique circumstances across the stakeholder groups. The study findings should be of interest to stakeholders who seek to better understand the issues surrounding ERP systems and to better realize the benefits of ERP.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.