Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub1
Evaluating Semantic Web Service Technologies: Criteria, Approaches and Challenges

Evaluating Semantic Web Service Technologies: Criteria, Approaches and Challenges

Ulrich Küster, Birgitta König-Ries, Matthias Klusch
Copyright: © 2010 |Pages: 24
ISBN13: 9781605669922|ISBN10: 160566992X|ISBN13 Softcover: 9781616922634|EISBN13: 9781605669939
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-992-2.ch001
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Küster, Ulrich, et al. "Evaluating Semantic Web Service Technologies: Criteria, Approaches and Challenges." Progressive Concepts for Semantic Web Evolution: Applications and Developments, edited by Miltiadis D. Lytras and Amit Sheth, IGI Global, 2010, pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-992-2.ch001

APA

Küster, U., König-Ries, B., & Klusch, M. (2010). Evaluating Semantic Web Service Technologies: Criteria, Approaches and Challenges. In M. Lytras & A. Sheth (Eds.), Progressive Concepts for Semantic Web Evolution: Applications and Developments (pp. 1-24). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-992-2.ch001

Chicago

Küster, Ulrich, Birgitta König-Ries, and Matthias Klusch. "Evaluating Semantic Web Service Technologies: Criteria, Approaches and Challenges." In Progressive Concepts for Semantic Web Evolution: Applications and Developments, edited by Miltiadis D. Lytras and Amit Sheth, 1-24. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-992-2.ch001

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

In recent years, a huge amount of research effort and funding has been devoted to the area of semantic web services (SWS). This has resulted in the proposal of numerous competing approaches to facilitate the automation of discovery, composition and mediation for web services using semantic annotations. However, despite of a wealth of theoretical work, too little effort has been spent towards the comparative experimental evaluation of the competing approaches so far. Progress in scientific development and industrial adoption is thereby hindered. An established evaluation methodology and standard benchmarks that allow the comparative evaluation of different frameworks are thus needed for the further advancement of the field. To this end, a criteria model for SWS evaluation is presented and the existing approaches towards SWS evaluation are comprehensively analyzed. Their shortcomings are discussed in order to identify the fundamental issues of SWS evaluation. Based on this discussion, a research agenda towards agreed upon evaluation methodologies is proposed.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.