Reference Hub1
Have You Taken Your Guys on the Journey?: An ANT Account of IS Project Evaluation

Have You Taken Your Guys on the Journey?: An ANT Account of IS Project Evaluation

Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic, Fouad Nagm
ISBN13: 9781609601973|ISBN10: 1609601971|EISBN13: 9781609601997
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-197-3.ch001
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka, and Fouad Nagm. "Have You Taken Your Guys on the Journey?: An ANT Account of IS Project Evaluation." Actor-Network Theory and Technology Innovation: Advancements and New Concepts, edited by Arthur Tatnall, IGI Global, 2011, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-197-3.ch001

APA

Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. & Nagm, F. (2011). Have You Taken Your Guys on the Journey?: An ANT Account of IS Project Evaluation. In A. Tatnall (Ed.), Actor-Network Theory and Technology Innovation: Advancements and New Concepts (pp. 1-19). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-197-3.ch001

Chicago

Cecez-Kecmanovic, Dubravka, and Fouad Nagm. "Have You Taken Your Guys on the Journey?: An ANT Account of IS Project Evaluation." In Actor-Network Theory and Technology Innovation: Advancements and New Concepts, edited by Arthur Tatnall, 1-19. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-197-3.ch001

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Pre-investment evaluation of information system (IS) project proposals persists to be problematic and highly risky in practice. Numerous evaluation approaches and methodologies, offered in the literature, have not contributed to major improvements in practice. In this paper we propose a radical departure from the dominant conceptions in IS evaluation literature by adopting Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to provide a better understanding of the development and evaluation of IS proposals in practice and examine the ways in which the evaluation process shapes and ensures the selection of the best IS projects. By drawing on a field study of the IS evaluation processes in a company with a history of IS successes, we reveal the relational nature of IS project proposals and the ways they are constitutively entangled with business processes and practices. Our ANT account demonstrates: a) that the view of pre-investment IS evaluation in the literature is very narrow; b) that the practice of IS evaluation produces the ‘object’ it evaluates; c) that this object, that is the IS project proposal document, is a focal actor (an inscription device) produced by relations in the actor-network emerging around it; and d) that reconfiguration of these relations involving the translation of actors’ expertise, experiences and interests into the IS proposal documents are critical for the evaluation of IS project proposals and their chances of success.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.