Reference Hub1
The Member for Cyberspace: E-Representation and MPs in the UK

The Member for Cyberspace: E-Representation and MPs in the UK

Nigel Jackson, Darren G. Lilleker
ISBN13: 9781613503294|ISBN10: 1613503296|EISBN13: 9781613503300
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-329-4.ch005
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Jackson, Nigel, and Darren G. Lilleker. "The Member for Cyberspace: E-Representation and MPs in the UK." E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation: Concept, Experiences and Lessons, edited by Mehmet Zahid Sobaci, IGI Global, 2012, pp. 64-79. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-329-4.ch005

APA

Jackson, N. & Lilleker, D. G. (2012). The Member for Cyberspace: E-Representation and MPs in the UK. In M. Sobaci (Ed.), E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation: Concept, Experiences and Lessons (pp. 64-79). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-329-4.ch005

Chicago

Jackson, Nigel, and Darren G. Lilleker. "The Member for Cyberspace: E-Representation and MPs in the UK." In E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation: Concept, Experiences and Lessons, edited by Mehmet Zahid Sobaci, 64-79. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-329-4.ch005

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

This chapter offers a framework for considering whether the Internet might be facilitating the evolution of e-representation. The chapter starts by considering the meaning of representation; it then considers what factors influence changes in the concept of representation. We argue that, potentially, the Internet may be facilitating a model of representation based not on the geographic constituency, but upon common interest. The chapter assesses the use of four Internet modalities by UK Members of Parliaments (MPs): websites, e-newsletters, weblogs, and social networking sites. We suggest that there is evidence of parallel e-representation, where MPs use the Internet to enhance their relationship with geographical constituents. We also find the basis for a separate form of e-representation based around the development of an e-constituency of those with shared policy interests. We suggest that by creating a more flexible model, e-representation may add significant nuance to the direct versus representative democracy debate.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.