Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Water Access in the Fight Against Poverty: Tourism or Multiple Use of Water Services?

Water Access in the Fight Against Poverty: Tourism or Multiple Use of Water Services?

Diego Azqueta, Álvaro Montoya
Copyright: © 2011 |Volume: 2 |Issue: 4 |Pages: 11
ISSN: 1947-8402|EISSN: 1947-8410|EISBN13: 9781613509128|DOI: 10.4018/jsesd.2011100104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Azqueta, Diego, and Álvaro Montoya. "Water Access in the Fight Against Poverty: Tourism or Multiple Use of Water Services?." IJSESD vol.2, no.4 2011: pp.44-54. http://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2011100104

APA

Azqueta, D. & Montoya, Á. (2011). Water Access in the Fight Against Poverty: Tourism or Multiple Use of Water Services?. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 2(4), 44-54. http://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2011100104

Chicago

Azqueta, Diego, and Álvaro Montoya. "Water Access in the Fight Against Poverty: Tourism or Multiple Use of Water Services?," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD) 2, no.4: 44-54. http://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2011100104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Rural poverty in underdeveloped countries is a critical issue. A fair amount of literature exists examining the conditions of pro-poor tourism development, as well as different ways to fight it. However, in some cases, and because of the existence of a limiting factor, a potential incompatibility between tourist development and other strategies can emerge, as well as the need to compare relative efficiency. An example of this potential conflict is the one posed by tourist development and the Multiple Use of Water Services strategy (MUS) to alleviate rural poverty. In this case, the limiting constraint is access to water. This paper analyses the impacts, direct and indirect, on poverty levels, of tourist development and MUS. the authors examine the Quindío Region in Colombia, where the MUS strategy is being implemented and where an ambitious tourist development plan may open social conflict regarding water supply. The results of this analysis shows that, even if the MUS strategy has a greater positive impact on poverty alleviation, in terms of income and employment generated per unit of water, its water footprint, contrary to expectations, is much higher than the one corresponding to the tourist sector. This may jeopardize its future development, calling for a more balanced approach.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.