Reference Hub6
Single Machine Scheduling with Rejection: Minimizing Total Weighted Completion Time and Rejection Cost

Single Machine Scheduling with Rejection: Minimizing Total Weighted Completion Time and Rejection Cost

Atefeh Moghaddam, Lionel Amodeo, Farouk Yalaoui, Behrooz Karimi
Copyright: © 2012 |Volume: 3 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 20
ISSN: 1942-3594|EISSN: 1942-3608|EISBN13: 9781466610729|DOI: 10.4018/jaec.2012040103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Moghaddam, Atefeh, et al. "Single Machine Scheduling with Rejection: Minimizing Total Weighted Completion Time and Rejection Cost." IJAEC vol.3, no.2 2012: pp.42-61. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaec.2012040103

APA

Moghaddam, A., Amodeo, L., Yalaoui, F., & Karimi, B. (2012). Single Machine Scheduling with Rejection: Minimizing Total Weighted Completion Time and Rejection Cost. International Journal of Applied Evolutionary Computation (IJAEC), 3(2), 42-61. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaec.2012040103

Chicago

Moghaddam, Atefeh, et al. "Single Machine Scheduling with Rejection: Minimizing Total Weighted Completion Time and Rejection Cost," International Journal of Applied Evolutionary Computation (IJAEC) 3, no.2: 42-61. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaec.2012040103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

In this paper, the authors consider a single machine scheduling problem with rejection. In traditional research, it is assumed all jobs must be processed. However, in the real-world situation, certain jobs can be rejected. In this study, the jobs can be either accepted and scheduled or be rejected at the cost of a penalty. Two objective functions are considered simultaneously: (1) minimization of the sum of weighted completion times for the accepted jobs, and (2) minimization of the sum of penalties for the rejected jobs. The authors apply two-phase method (TPM), which is a general technique to solve bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems, to find all supported and non-supported solutions for small-sized problems. The authors present a mathematical model for implementing both phases. On the other hand, three different bi-objective simulated annealing algorithms have also been developed to find a good estimation of Pareto-optimal solutions for large-sized problems. Finally the authors discuss the results obtained from each of these algorithms.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.