Reference Hub32
Service Path Attribution Networks (SPANs): A Network Flow Approach to Ecosystem Service Assessment

Service Path Attribution Networks (SPANs): A Network Flow Approach to Ecosystem Service Assessment

Gary W. Johnson, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Robert R. Snapp, Ferdinando Villa
Copyright: © 2012 |Volume: 3 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 18
ISSN: 1947-3192|EISSN: 1947-3206|EISBN13: 9781466610668|DOI: 10.4018/jaeis.2012070104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Johnson, Gary W., et al. "Service Path Attribution Networks (SPANs): A Network Flow Approach to Ecosystem Service Assessment." IJAEIS vol.3, no.2 2012: pp.54-71. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaeis.2012070104

APA

Johnson, G. W., Bagstad, K. J., Snapp, R. R., & Villa, F. (2012). Service Path Attribution Networks (SPANs): A Network Flow Approach to Ecosystem Service Assessment. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), 3(2), 54-71. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaeis.2012070104

Chicago

Johnson, Gary W., et al. "Service Path Attribution Networks (SPANs): A Network Flow Approach to Ecosystem Service Assessment," International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS) 3, no.2: 54-71. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaeis.2012070104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Ecosystem services are the effects on human well-being of the flow of benefits from ecosystems to people over given extents of space and time. The Service Path Attribution Network (SPAN) model provides a spatial framework for determining the topology and strength of these flows and identifies the human and ecological features which give rise to them. As an aid to decision-making, this approach discovers dependencies between provision and usage endpoints, spatial competition among users for scarce resources, and areas of highest likely impact on ecosystem service flows. Particularly novel is the model’s ability to quantify services provided by the absence of a flow. SPAN models have been developed for a number of services (scenic views, proximity to open space, carbon sequestration, flood mitigation, nutrient cycling, and avoided sedimentation/deposition), which vary in scale of effect, mechanism of provision and use, and type of flow. Results using real world data are shown for the US Puget Sound region.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.