Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub2
Innovative or Indefensible? An Empirical Assessment of Patenting within Standard Setting

Innovative or Indefensible? An Empirical Assessment of Patenting within Standard Setting

Anne Layne-Farrar
Copyright: © 2013 |Pages: 18
ISBN13: 9781466621602|ISBN10: 1466621605|EISBN13: 9781466621619
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2160-2.ch001
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Layne-Farrar, Anne. "Innovative or Indefensible? An Empirical Assessment of Patenting within Standard Setting." Innovations in Organizational IT Specification and Standards Development, edited by Kai Jakobs, IGI Global, 2013, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2160-2.ch001

APA

Layne-Farrar, A. (2013). Innovative or Indefensible? An Empirical Assessment of Patenting within Standard Setting. In K. Jakobs (Ed.), Innovations in Organizational IT Specification and Standards Development (pp. 1-18). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2160-2.ch001

Chicago

Layne-Farrar, Anne. "Innovative or Indefensible? An Empirical Assessment of Patenting within Standard Setting." In Innovations in Organizational IT Specification and Standards Development, edited by Kai Jakobs, 1-18. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2160-2.ch001

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

Cooperative standard setting may be burdened by “over patenting”. Because standards may convey market power to firms whose patents are implicated, “strategic” patenting may enable opportunistic behaviors. Thus, particular concerns have been raised over patenting that takes place after the first versions of a standard are published, as these patents may be aimed at the acquisition of market power. This is a reasonable concern, but another possibility also may be likely: “ex post” patenting may be driven by genuine innovation. Which is more prevalent? To begin answering this question, the author empirically assesses the patenting that occurs within a standard setting organization. The author rejects the first stage hypothesis that all ex post patenting must be opportunistic and conclude instead that such patenting is likely a mixed bag of (incremental) innovative contributions along with some strategic ones. As a result, standard setting policy prescriptions should proceed with caution so that the good is not eliminated with the bad.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.