Reference Hub4
Establishing and Verifying a Risk Ontology for Surfacing ERP Post-Implementation Risks

Establishing and Verifying a Risk Ontology for Surfacing ERP Post-Implementation Risks

Guo Chao Alex Peng, Miguel Baptista Nunes
ISBN13: 9781466641532|ISBN10: 1466641533|EISBN13: 9781466641549
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4153-2.ch025
Cite Chapter Cite Chapter

MLA

Peng, Guo Chao Alex, and Miguel Baptista Nunes. "Establishing and Verifying a Risk Ontology for Surfacing ERP Post-Implementation Risks." Enterprise Resource Planning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, IGI Global, 2013, pp. 450-474. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4153-2.ch025

APA

Peng, G. C. & Nunes, M. B. (2013). Establishing and Verifying a Risk Ontology for Surfacing ERP Post-Implementation Risks. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Enterprise Resource Planning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 450-474). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4153-2.ch025

Chicago

Peng, Guo Chao Alex, and Miguel Baptista Nunes. "Establishing and Verifying a Risk Ontology for Surfacing ERP Post-Implementation Risks." In Enterprise Resource Planning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, edited by Information Resources Management Association, 450-474. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4153-2.ch025

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite

Abstract

This chapter aims to establish and verify a risk ontology for the post-implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. The risk ontology was initially constructed through the process of a critical literature review. It consists of 40 ERP exploitation risks related to diverse operational, analytical, organization-wide, and technical aspects. This theoretical risk ontology can be used as the basis for identifying and assessing ERP post-implementation risks within different organizational and national contexts. In order to illustrate the discussion, a previous ERP study in China is presented as an example. The study adopted a mixed-methods design, which involved a questionnaire survey and a follow-up case study. The questionnaire examined the suitability of the established risk ontology in the context of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). The follow-up case study then further explored and validated the questionnaire findings. By integrating the quantitative and qualitative findings, the original ontology was verified, revised, and extended.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.