Reference Hub4
A Complex Systems Paradox of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management

A Complex Systems Paradox of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management

Soheil Ghili, Serima Nazarian, Madjid Tavana, Sepehr Keyvanshokouhi, Mohammad Taghi Isaai
Copyright: © 2013 |Volume: 3 |Issue: 3 |Pages: 20
ISSN: 2155-6393|EISSN: 2155-6407|EISBN13: 9781466634596|DOI: 10.4018/ijkbo.2013070104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Ghili, Soheil, et al. "A Complex Systems Paradox of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management." IJKBO vol.3, no.3 2013: pp.53-72. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijkbo.2013070104

APA

Ghili, S., Nazarian, S., Tavana, M., Keyvanshokouhi, S., & Isaai, M. T. (2013). A Complex Systems Paradox of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO), 3(3), 53-72. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijkbo.2013070104

Chicago

Ghili, Soheil, et al. "A Complex Systems Paradox of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO) 3, no.3: 53-72. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijkbo.2013070104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Many organizations are striving to survive and remain competitive in the current uncertain and rapidly changing economic environment. Businesses must innovate to face this volatility and maintain their competitiveness. Organizational learning is a complex process with many interrelated elements linking knowledge management with organizational innovation. In this paper we use several theories (i.e., organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, complexity theory, and systems theory) to discover and study the interrelationships among the organizational learning elements. The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) We identify organizational learning as a mediating variable between knowledge management and organizational innovation; (2) We further present a paradox where decisions that are expected to improve organizational learning, surprisingly do not work; and (3) We show this paradox is not the result of overlooking organizational learning elements, but rather, caused by neglecting to consider the complex interrelationships and interdependencies among them.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.