Applying Balanced Scorecard to Blackboard Technology in Accounting Education

Applying Balanced Scorecard to Blackboard Technology in Accounting Education

Assion Lawson-Body, Lori Willoughby, Laurence Lawson-Body
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/IJTHI.300281
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

The objective of this study is to use balanced scorecard (BSC) to measure the performance of accounting students when instructors utilize Blackboard to teach courses. A framework was designed to show the relationships between the BSC's four interrelated business perspectives and the use of Blackboard in accounting education. Content analysis was used to process in-depth interview data that were collected from 13 accounting students of a college of business in the US. The results show that three of the four Blackboard-supported BSC perspectives (internal process, student value proposition, and financial) have an impact on accounting students' academic performance. However, the impact of the fourth Blackboard-supported BSC perspective (learning and innovation) on accounting students' academic performance is different because the accounting career is a continuous learning endeavor. The changing and evolving nature of the Blackboard technology does not fit into the evolution of accounting principles, regulations, and laws.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

To overcome a declining retention rate in accounting courses and to attract more of its students to become accounting majors without sacrificing student learning or increasing costs (C. Spiceland, J. Spiceland, & Schaeffer III, 2015; Watty, McKay, & Ngo, 2016; Ersoy-Babula, & Babula, 2018), many accounting institutions have adopted Blackboard technology to deliver courses (L. Lawson-Body, Willoughby, A. Lawson-Body, 2015; Clark-Gordon, Bowman, Hadden, & Frisby, 2019). Academic executives have been giving increased attention to the measurement of accounting students’ performance through the use of interactive learning technologies, which are heavily used in accounting education (Özpeynirci, Yücenurşen, Apak, & Polat, 2015; Watty et al., 2016). Blackboard technology is becoming a teaching method used to adapt online learning instructions to the needs of accounting students (Basioudis & de Lange, 2009; Wilson, 2013; L. Lawson-Body et al., 2015; Gibeault, 2018).

Today, every reputed educational institution run their online learning courses and hybrid learning courses (traditional face-to-face courses delivery combined with online learning courses) under the electronic learning (e-learning) system (Zhang, Zhou, Briggs, & Nunamaker Jr., 2006; Delen, Liew, & Willson, 2014; Alenezi & Shahi, 2015; Navimipour & Zareie, 2015; Gibeault, 2018; Gavaldon & McGarr, 2019; Clark-Gordon et al. 2019; Salama, Iskandara, Ibrahima, & Farooq, 2019). Many instructors use Blackboard to monitor students’ progress carefully and to boost students’ performance (Gibeault, 2018; Fluck, 2019). These benefits of the use of Blackboard have been diversely appreciated because some learners are dissatisfied with their e-learning experience (Liaw, 2008; Gibeault, 2018). That raises a critical issue of how the use of Blackboard contributes to the academic performance of accounting students, because accounting education continues after the graduation of accounting students. Many students struggle with the analytical thinking process required in accounting (C. Spiceland et al., 2015). Without a strong motivation to apply the extra time they may need to be successful in accounting, students will often get discouraged and stop trying (C. Spiceland et al., 2015; Watty et al., 2016). What matters for most accounting students is not the degrees delivered by the academic institutions, rather it is to maintain certification through continued education.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 7 Issues (2022): 4 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing